Should welfare recipients be tested for drugs?

Only if their is evidence of criminality or drug addiction, and if positive they should be provided with free treatment

I think that welfare should be done with vouchers instead of money so they are spent on things actually needed instead of drugs or alcohol.

Yes, but only for those claiming benefits where they are expected to be looking for work. If positive, they should have to attend support and treatment program, then sanctioned for non-compliance. Should not be allowed to claim disability benefits for drug abuse related health conditions.

Yes and no, neutral stance, depends on why and the circumstances or severity of circumstances. Anyone struggling with mental/physical health and or addiction issues, or general testing positive should also be given proper and further/better help, resources, support, rehabilitation, and it should be further/better safeguarded too, and still a choice, the same goes for overall health or things like misusing benefits, whether someone works or not, everyone should be able to get tests by choice or if mandatory especially. All tests should have safeguarding and restrictions, and still respect righ…  Read morets, even of those testing positive or with addiction issues, to make it harder to misuse/claim benefits depending on circumstances and protect people, especially those most vulnerable, and when people abuse or take advantages of benefits, there should be more standards and actions taken's as necessary and appropriately/affectively to suit the circumstances and stop people from doing so.

No, we should decriminalize most drugs

No only those with criminal history of drug abuse and provide treatment for those testing positive

No, and legalize some drugs.

Only if they're suspected or if there is sufficient evidence to prove they are

No, there should be no welfare benefits.

Yes but include everyone including politicians and royals and offer treatment for anyone testing positive for recreational drugs

Drug abuse in criminal and real related who delivers a mental health care with most in parts of the county as always

No, but corporate CEOs should instead

No, this is invasive and quite honestly offensive. If the welfare recipient is using or addicted to drugs, they should receive help, but they should not be required to undergo testing for drugs. Honesty and transparency should be promoted.

no, but if there are people with a history of addiction, provide them with help

We should only be giving a small amount to those who actually need it

No, this is a waste of money but treatment should be provided to welfare recipients who are addicted to drugs

Provide treatment for any suspected drug use within governmental and public positions including psychological and physical analysis

No, what people do in their own time is their own choice. Unless the drug use is causing them to require benefits

No, support shouldn't be dependant on sobriety

No, but more funding should be given for drug abuse support and education.

Yes, and provide treatment for those testing positive and provide education on financial literacy to assist them once out of rehab.

Only if they have a history of it or signs of it and if positive should be given help and not punished.

Decriminalise drugs and offer support to those who are using drugs. They should not have their benefits restricted or be penalised. They should have safe clinics ran by the NHS to support them to use substances safely and have a place where they can be supported to reduce/stop their drug use.

No, unless all MPs and government ministers face the same tests.

Yes, if they are suspected of taking them. Benefits should be terminated if found to be positive.

No, but options for treatment should be provided and advertised for those who want it

Yes, test anyone, and send them to rehab if they’re positive.

No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse. They should then be supported with rehabilitation if positive.

Yes, and ascertain if they require help.

Yes, and cut benefits while providing treatment

No, Leads down a dark road to lose of personal freedoms and bodily autonomy. Of course unless the Politicians and civil servants want to go first.

Yes but only if they have a criminal history related to drug use and provide services to end addiction if this is the case

Yes, if they have a history of drug use. However we should offer treatment if they test positive.

Yes they should be tested but they should be deducted money and if they continue or refuse regular checks they should terminate their money.

yes, but only terminate benefits for those testing positive of using class As

Yes and aided.

Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians but provide treatment for those testing positive

No mandatory testing unless they have a criminal history related to drug abuse that is harmful and detrimental for the individual, including legal substance abuses such as alcohol, with help offered in coming over these problems.

No, in the case that the system is reformed so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income

Decriminalise all drugs like portugal

Yes, if they have a history related to drug usage

Only if politicians are also drug tested.

The system would stay the same, unless a petition was successful in putting such a question to the people via Liquid Democracy

Only if they are suspected of taking drugs by the social support and community workers around them, not simply because they are claiming benefits.

Only if there is moderate proof that this is occurring

No but a program should be offered to help anyone overcome an addiction

No, so long as their behaviour does not endanger any dependants.

No, test the government instead

No, but all people, regardless of income, should be given full and free support to wean themselves off drugs.