Should businesses be required to have women on their board of directors?

This would only be ‘box ticking’. The real route of misogyny in the workplace must be tackled, which would then see a natural progression towards more women in senior roles

Just the best people for the job regardless of sex

No, people should attend this if they have the right qualities regardless of gender BUT if tla board is predominantly one-side, gender-wise, it should be open to being subject to investigations to ensure this is the case.

I believe people should be hired based on ability, but also believe more should be done through education and the business sector to encourage diversity so women regularly are seen on boards of directors.

No, but a lack of female workers at a higher level shouldn’t have to be a debate it should be the standard without needing laws

The most qualified person should get the job, however if the two most qualified people are one male and one female, then on the grounds of equality the female should get the job

Regardless of gender, it should be based off skill sets and qualifications. Both have equal chance to prove that though

All businesses should be owned and democratically controlled by the workers who work there. The board should be elected workers voted for by their fellow colleagues at the AGM. The same percentage of women as are in the workforce of said company should have the same percentage of the board reserved for women, and the same for other minorities.

Only if those women have proved their worth or have relevant credentials necessary to be on the board.

I believe whoever is equipped for the job should take it, however this is not always the case and regardless of whether a woman is more qualified, they'll be told they aren't. I believe transparency in the hiring process is key.

There should be a focus on the implementation of equity on all levels, thus, employment would naturally be based on qualification rather than identity factors

No, If businesses are stupid enough to willingly reduce their diversity then that will show in their productivity, and market viability.

Yes but there should also be focus on progression and development to support and encourage diversity

No but there should be substantial grassroots support to break down barriers to entry for women, the gender pay gap, and inequality of access.

No, the board members should be selected based solely on skill and inclusivity should never be forced up on

I think diversity is important, however you need to be qualified for the job. I believe diversity and discrimination is a big issue and we need to do more to make sure fair pay and job opportunity is there for everyone specially for women.

Dependent on applications and skill sets for jobs.

It should be the most qualified, but women need to be given the same opportunities as men to get to the same level.

They're shouldn't be a board of derectors and if their was then men should always lead.

Yes if she's the best candidate

Yes, but there should be a bigger push from grass routes to get women to the top. And not just given the job to tick a box

Woman shouldn't be denied yet they should be there like everyone else was.

No, board members should be competent regardless of gender. Being qualified does not mean you are competent.

Subsidies or special tax advantages should be considered to help nudge companies toward choosing diverse boards.

No, there should not be private businesses

It shouldn't be a requirement, but it should be encouraged, supported and advertised.

Yes and the government should do more to require diversity in the workplace for both sexes

it should be the most qualified/right for the job, but businesses should do more for diversity in the workplace

Yes, and only biological women

They don't have to have women but if a women is qualified then she should be allowed

The most qualified for the job should be on the board, not matter the gender

No, but i disagree with the idea of a board of directors as a whole

No but there should be incentives offered where this is achieved

Yes, but only for big companies

No, but diversification is preferred.

Yes, nepotism wins over meritocracy almost every time, the only way to get a fair level of diversity is by government mandate

It should be about how qualified you are regardless of gender but there should be diversity in the workplace in some way or another

Yes, but from a pool of candidates otherwise suitably qualified for the role

No as I think it is the wrong solution to a real problem. Companies and the government should work to promote diversity and equality across all workplaces but I dont think that this particular solution is the way forward.

No, it yes if they are qualified for the position.

No, but more support should be given to those from minority/disadvantaged groups to ensure they have equal opportunity; companies should also be given training to reduce their prejudices and be made aware of them.

They should be required to at least interview women, people of colour etc.

No but more should be done to support women in all areas of business eg better maternity rights

no but should be highly encouraged and incentivised

Best person for the Job. Shouldn't be given anything based on gender

No, there should just be less men, buissnesses shouldn't exist, along with government and capitalism

If they are qualified and experienced, then there's no reason why not.

Individuals should be on director boards based on their ability and not determined by their gender

Woman should stay home.