Should cities implement congestion pricing to reduce traffic in busy urban areas?

No just ban private vehicles from City Centres. Re-Pedestrianize these areas which would bring back foot traffic and allow businesses to thrive again.

Affordable and reliable other methods of travel such as tubes trains trans and buses need to be better

Yes, and funds raised by conversation pricing should go directly to improving public transport in those areas

I agree it will make things better for the environment but it is unfair on those who are travelling for work, for example, as it may not be a 'choice' that they are travelling through said areas.

Only with solid public transport infrastructure. So masses of secure park and ride that's cheap. £3 and fre busses all over the area

Only on vehicles with emissions over a certain amount; sports cars and big trucks etc. The signage and zoning should be VERY clear also.

Yes, Only on commercial vehichles and on the provision that this is then invested in developing more suitable alternative routes.

Only if the alternative is frequent, accessible and affordable

No, the government should invest in making sure public transport is usable for everyone and for commuting..this will then reduce congestion

as long as the tax is used for positive change such as potholes and bike lanes

They should improve public transport which would reduce traffic

Yes, and invest the money into public transport, bike lanes, and subsidies to purchase bikes.

Yes, but use the revenue raised to improve public transport.

No they need to provide better infrastructure first (public transport, bike lanes etc)

Promote public transportation for busy urban areas and increase funding.

Yes as long as other suburban areas don't suffer as a result of heavier traffic.

Yes, but there should be exceptions for electric cars, people who are dependent on cars for commuting e.g. wheel chair users, low income families

Drastically improve and subsidise public transport before introducing congestion charging so there is a cost effective or free viable alternative

The roads are a mess what happened to park and ride = Car free city centres? And bypasses = no through traffic

No, The government should invest in affordable public transport instead.

They should make more walkable and pedestrian focussed cities

Yes, with concessions for people on low incomes and local residents

Yes, but only if there is a reliable public transport service available.

No, I Don't Think That Will Help The Situation As Many People Need To Get To Work By Car, Bus, Or Train!

It should be about money. It should be about pollution. You drive a polluting car, you pay for it.

No, not until adequate public transport is made affordable and accessible

No, but city councils can opt to tax the providers of roads as a sort-of congestion charge in-kind, where the costs of the tax would be passed on to the consumers of roads, otherwise known as drivers

Yes, but the funds raised must be put towards improving public transport infrastructure

yes, but only in clearly defined areas and at specified times

Only if the entirety of the money received goes into local transport infrastructure

No, this unfairly targets low income households. It would be fairer to have a quota system.

More park and rides or free parking. More bypasses

Yes but only if sufficient public transport alternatives are available

Yes it should be scientifically worked out how much a single car is emitting co2 in that time frame and charge for the environmental damage in £

Yes but only if there are efficient and practical alternatives to using a car.

Yes but to do this there must be good transport infrastructure in place already. If there isn't this is a bad idea

Yes, for the benefit of the rich, not the environment.

No, but instead focusing more on accessibility of public transport and encourage people to walk more

Yes, but money should only be used for improving public transport or transport infrastructure

No, there should be an increase in public transport spending to give people alternatives means of travel, that is both reliable and affordable.

Up to each individual city. the current system is fine.

Yes if better cycling infrastructure is implemented like Netherlands

Improve public transport, reduce road use that way!

Yes, but only if other acceptable, effective forms of transport around the city exists.

Only if the city has excellent and affordable public transport

Yes but this shouldn't penalise people on lower incomes. If someone has to drive into a city for work then government should work with employers to ease costs if there are no other commuting options available

Money should instead go on quality public transport to encourage people to use that instead.

Yes, but there should be exceptions for people who are dependent on cars for commuting e.g. wheel char users

No, but offer incentives to get more efficient vehicles