Currently UK trains are operated by private franchises and the tracks are operated by the government. Proponents argue that the system would run more efficiently if the tracks and trains were operated by private entities. Opponents of privatization claim that a single government train system would end the disruptions caused by the fractured franchise system.
24% Yes |
76% No |
22% Yes |
74% No |
2% Yes, but allow more local control |
2% No, eliminate any privatisation and have the government operate the trains and tracks |
0% Yes, privatise the operation of the trains and tracks |
See how support for each position on “National Railway” has changed over time for 2.1m UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “National Railway” has changed over time for 2.1m UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9LXMFKT2 days2D
Does not effect me and i do not have an opinion and don’t complety understand the effects of my answer to this question.
@9L2BSXL1mo1MO
No, the public should have more ownership which will allow for more local control and savings in funds.
@9L2BRYB1mo1MO
Infrastructure should be owned by the state. There could be a national train operator but it must compete with private operators
@8SQV9FX3yrs3Y
Government to own the trains and tracks but operated like the current LNER is but with a ' board of governors' like with schools made up of customer groups, government, staff safety executive
@8SQC9ZY3yrs3Y
just make train journeys cheaper full stop who cares if its privatised or not
@8SQ955R3yrs3Y
Yes with increased services
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “National Railway” news articles, updated frequently.
Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.