87%
Yes
13%
No
81%
Yes
12%
No
4%
Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security
0%
No, but reduce their sentences
2%
Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Whistleblower Protection” has changed over time for 67.4k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Whistleblower Protection” has changed over time for 67.4k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9GHFFBNanswered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only if the information pertains to breach of UK laws, or international treaties/agreements/laws/organisations the UK is party to

 @9G5MCLJanswered…6mos6MO

Whistleblowers should be protected. If the information was obtained illegally, sentence them but with reduced sentences. If the information does threaten national security, it depends on the situation whether they are protected or not.

 @9DLN48Banswered…8mos8MO

It would depend a lot on the specific instances. Whistle blowing deemed unnecessary should have consequences

 @9D2G5NJanswered…9mos9MO

Yes but ensure private investigations are launched to ensure the information revealed to pubic by whistle-blower is true. If information revealed by whistle-blowers is false ensure charges can be pressed

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.