49%
Yes
51%
No
42%
Yes
41%
No
4%
Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
7%
No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”
3%
Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits
2%
No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time
0%
Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Term Limits” has changed over time for 86.7k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Term Limits” has changed over time for 86.7k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9L4VP4Xanswered…3wks3W

Yes. Term limits should be promoted until corporate and organizational lobbying/funding is abolished, along with other forms of corruption which does not lead to true and healthy democratic representation.

 @9KZM56Sanswered…4wks4W

No, but an MP should not be allowed to run for the same constituency after winning two elections and losing a 3rd. Give new aspiring politicians a chance. The defeated MP can run elsewhere however.

 @9HD7XT3 answered…4mos4MO

Difficult - some people are exceptional and we want their public service for as long as possible - age however find the mind and there should be cognitive testing post 65

 @9GDFSNDanswered…6mos6MO

No, but there should be age limits. Elderly politicians running the country have no incentive to improve the world for the younger generations, making them prone to selfish decisions

 @97ZMKPLanswered…1yr1Y

No because the constituents might want to keep their MP. I think it violates democracy.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.