57%
Yes
43%
No
33%
Yes
43%
No
15%
Yes, but only if they refuse to move to an available smaller property
9%
Yes, but with exception for those with disabled family members

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Bedroom Tax” has changed over time for 495k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Bedroom Tax” has changed over time for 495k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9LMW7N4answered…5 days5D

This is something that depends on individual circumstances; in some cases there are not available properties for people to move to. I do not support needlessly penalising individuals and it may be harmful to relocate people without just cause if they have lived in an area for a long time. However, if available properties exist people should be given the option to move into housing more suited to their circumstances.

 @9LK6Y63answered…1wk1W

No, depends on duration they have been residents and extended family situation. i.e. grandparents need spare rooms for visiting family, parents of university students retaining the child's room and parents who don't have custody of children but need to make provision for. Disabled people may need spare rooms for overnight carers.

 @9L2VYKManswered…1mo1MO

No if they are receiving disabled benefits. Many disabled need spare room but dont need overnight care everynight and are suffering and should not be forced to pay bedroom tax. Especially those suffering mental health who need a spare room for aomeone to stay to support mental breakdown

 @9JTN484answered…2mos2MO

Yes, however should actively receive help in the meantime from their housing association or council to downsize to a different property suitable to their needs. Abolish the bedroom tax.

 @9HKYK28answered…4mos4MO

Hard to see a simple answer to this one that wouldn’t either harshly penalise edge cases (eg where a household member has died) or give too much leeway to pisstakers. Would have to be case-by-case.

 @9FVKSV6answered…7mos7MO

Only if they're not using the rooms, at all. Some people have a lot of things that need space and it's unfair to assume they should either have barely anything to qualify or get rid of things.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.