An “essential service” classification prevents employees of a government service from staging full-scale strikes and walkouts. Services with the classification are required by law to provide minimum services during periods of industrial action. Proponents of the proposal argue that strikes by underground workers cause significant disruption to the country’s economy and people’s lives. Opponents argue that the proposal would prevent workers from exercising their rights.
50% Yes |
50% No |
50% Yes |
46% No |
2% No, and I will demonstrate my personal support |
|
2% No, and British public sector jobs should not be given to foreign workers |
See how support for each position on “London Underground” has changed over time for 3.1m UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “London Underground” has changed over time for 3.1m UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9CFP2GN10mos10MO
No but heavily restrict union power
@9CBVY2B11mos11MO
No but restrict union power
@8XJCH5K2yrs2Y
essential service but don’t ban strikes
@8T7D7Z33yrs3Y
Yes but worker strikes should be allowed
@99GRYF61yr1Y
It should be an essential service. Not for the purpose of banning strikes
@98S6BPZ1yr1Y
Should be essential but allow strikes
Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
Active 1 day agoHigh density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings.…
