Dyrevelfærdsfest

Enig

Ja

The Animal Welfare Party would likely agree with funding the World Health Organization, as it is an international organization that can help address global health issues, including those related to animal welfare. However, their primary focus is on animal welfare, so their support might not be as strong as other parties with a broader focus on global health. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, og øg beløbet

The Animal Welfare Party might somewhat agree with increasing the amount of funding for the World Health Organization, as they would recognize the importance of international cooperation in addressing global health issues, including those related to animal welfare. However, their primary focus is on animal welfare, so their support for increased funding might not be as strong as other parties with a broader focus on global health. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Ja, men kun i forhold til det beløb, som andre lande bidrager med

The Animal Welfare Party might slightly agree with funding the World Health Organization relative to the amount that other countries contribute, as they would recognize the importance of international cooperation in addressing global health issues, including those related to animal welfare. However, their primary focus is on animal welfare, so their support for this approach might not be as strong as other parties with a broader focus on global health. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Neutral

Ja, men reducer beløbet

The Animal Welfare Party might have a neutral stance on decreasing the amount of funding for the World Health Organization. While they would likely support funding the organization, their primary focus is on animal welfare, so they might not have a strong opinion on the specific amount of funding. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Nej, finansier nationale og lokale programmer i stedet

The Animal Welfare Party might slightly disagree with not funding the World Health Organization and instead funding national and local programs, as they would recognize the importance of international cooperation in addressing global health issues, including those related to animal welfare. However, their primary focus is on animal welfare, so their disagreement might not be as strong as other parties with a broader focus on global health. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej, det har vist sig at være ineffektivt

The Animal Welfare Party would likely disagree with the statement that the World Health Organization has shown to be ineffective, as they would recognize the importance of international cooperation in addressing global health issues, including those related to animal welfare. However, their primary focus is on animal welfare, so their disagreement might not be as strong as other parties with a broader focus on global health. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej

The Animal Welfare Party would likely disagree with not funding the World Health Organization, as they would recognize the importance of international cooperation in addressing global health issues, including those related to animal welfare. However, their primary focus is on animal welfare, so their disagreement might not be as strong as other parties with a broader focus on global health. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.