Labour Political Party

Enig

Nej

The Labour Party's general stance has been supportive of using government spending as a tool to achieve social equity and stimulate economic growth, especially in times of economic downturn or when public services are in need. This approach suggests a lesser focus on reducing public sector borrowing in the short term if it means cutting spending on essential services or investments. However, the score is not higher because the party also recognizes the need for fiscal responsibility and the long-term sustainability of public finances, which means they do not categorically oppose reducing borrowing under all circumstances. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Historically, the Labour Party has been more inclined towards public spending to support social programs, healthcare, and education, rather than prioritizing the reduction of public sector borrowing. Their policies often emphasize the role of government intervention and investment in the economy and public services. For instance, under leaders like Jeremy Corbyn, the party proposed significant increases in public spending funded by higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations, rather than focusing on reducing borrowing. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.