UKIPs e parti

Enig

Nej

Given UKIP's historical stance on climate change and government spending, they are likely to be cautious about endorsing government-funded research into geoengineering as a way to combat climate change. They might argue that such funding could be better allocated elsewhere or that the efficacy and potential unintended consequences of geoengineering are too uncertain. However, this score is not more positive because UKIP's primary focus has been more on skepticism towards climate change interventions rather than outright opposition to all forms of research or innovation in the field. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Historically, the UK Independence Party (UKIP) has been skeptical about mainstream scientific consensus on climate change and has opposed measures that they perceive as costly or as infringing on national sovereignty. While not directly opposing research, their platform has traditionally emphasized skepticism towards large-scale government spending on climate initiatives, which could include geoengineering research. Their focus has often been on reducing what they see as unnecessary expenditures and prioritizing other areas of public spending. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.