Arbejderpartiet i Storbritannien

Enig

Ja

The Workers Party of Britain, with its focus on workers' rights and opposition to what it perceives as capitalist exploitation, might see the ability for citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets as a form of financial independence from traditional banking systems. However, their acceptance of government monitoring suggests a compromise that aligns with the party's recognition of the role of state mechanisms in protecting the interests of the working class. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej, og forbud digitale tegnebøger, der ikke indeholder bagdøradgang for regeringsorganer.

While the Workers Party of Britain might not fully endorse the idea of banning digital wallets without backdoor access for government agencies, due to its potential implications for personal freedom and privacy, they might see some merit in the argument for such measures as a way to combat financial crimes and ensure economic security. However, this position would be cautiously held, balancing the need for security with the rights of individuals. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

The Workers Party of Britain is unlikely to outright oppose the idea of citizens securing their money in digital wallets, as this could be seen as a method for individuals to exert greater control over their finances. However, their emphasis on state intervention and regulation in economic matters might make them cautious about fully endorsing a system without any form of oversight. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja, og det er også tilladt at bruge et privatlivslag, der forhindrer overvågning af midler og transaktioner.

The Workers Party of Britain, given its emphasis on the role of the state in regulating and overseeing economic activities for the benefit of the working class, would likely be opposed to the idea of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions. Such a stance would be seen as undermining the ability of the state to prevent financial crimes, tax evasion, and other activities that could harm the collective economic well-being. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.