Yes, replace it with a bill of rights that gives the UK more legislative control

I think we all know that removing the human rights act is a gross breech of the idiology behind the human rights act.

América operates under a bill of rights and recently voted that water was not a human right. Britain often follows América in many areas such as war and privitising national services. Children already far below the bread line, We can not afford to lose the human rights act.

I think we all know that removing the human rights act is a gross breech of the idiology behind the human rights act.

The Human Rights Act should be retained and not watered down. It’s ultimately our only protection from abuse by our own government.

The Human rights act is a fundamental cornerstone of our democracy today. We shouldn’t abolish something on which so many of our daily principles are based with something that people can rethink

the Human Rights Act is in place to provide basic human rights it is an act recognised all over the world and to abolish it in the UK would be reckless

The UK Human Rights Act plays an extremely important role in the UK. It gives everyone the basic rights to freedom everyone is entitled to, why would it need to be abolished that is ridiculous. If it was abolished that means you’re stripped of basic rights that everyone wants to have.

I don't have any faith in our current government to draw up a fair, or humane bills of rights concerning human rights.

The Human Rights Act gives a person(s) the right to exist freely and have the self-agency to stand against abusive entities through the public court on equal grounds. It protects individuals from corporate harm/abuse and sets an unarguable entitlement to rest and repose outside of the workplace, to ensure a suitable and ultimately, comfortable and enjoyable life. To deny the Human Rights Act is to deny fair protection of human life. No government/country should have the ability to control it's citizens on such a level that they could categorise a second-class citizen on a whim, that would be legally open to abuse and lack of protection to life.

Disagree, the human rights act should not be touched and I worry about the motives of anyone trying to get rid of it.

The human rights act protects the fundamental freedom and universal rights of all people as a consequence of the atrocities from WW2. The UK was a key signatory to this.

The human rights act prevents people from being mistreated for their gender, race etc, to abolish such an act leaves people vulnerable to these facts

The point is that countries do not have individual control, human rights should be universal and if we begin tailoring it to fit our own beliefs and values other countries will be justified in doing the same, and many people in less developed and intensely religious countries will suffer.

By changing the Human Rights Act you risk its abolition, which could result in regression. When we have come so far in terms of equality I think it would be ridiculous if we were to start undoing all the good that we have done. Even if you replace it with a similar bill of rights, people could still find loopholes in it and disobey it.

The human rights act is broad and covers everything it should do. Replacing with our own would allow ideological uses. And shouldn’t be done

The human rights act is an essential thing. People should be able to have the freedom of speech and the right to protest when necessary. People deserve to have their voices heard.

Our current bill of rights has been created with a more European view, allowing us to better align with global expectations

The human rights act ensures that no future prime minister or government can abuse their power to deny somebody their human right. It ensures that our rights are set out in legislation no matter who holds power in the House of Commons.

We are all entitled to things as Humans. Nobody should have any control over our basic human rights - and where is the line drawn?

There are well-established international agreements on Human Rights; efforts should be made to engage with the international community to strengthen and widen the scope.

Let's keep Human Rights as a universal set of rules that the world follows, this would create less confusion and also allow people to know that their rights do not change anywhere in the world

It would be plain wrong to replace the Human Rights Act. It exists for a reason and increasing legislative control just opens up the possibility to decrease what is considered a human right

The human rights act helps to protect those who need it do they are not discriminated against. For example, it protects those with disabilities so they cannot be denied work because of this.

The Human Rights Act enforcing the ECHR's convention means that it is an agreed-upon set of laws by international peers. A replacement bill that gave the UK more legislative control is more likely to face revision abuse by UK officials to suit an internal agenda.

The human rights act was created with the intention of ensuring that people have basic human right, replacing this is dangerous as the basic human rights won’t serve us and could easily be changed by the party in power in the UK. It could be easily impacted by a bias.

The Human Rights Act is a minimum standard for how we should be treated, and this standard should be maintained.

We are part of a global world and we will need to align so more UK legislative control is an illusion. Besides we had a lot of legislative control during the creation of the human rights act

The Human Rights Act should be a standard across the globe. We can’t pick and choose what is a right just because we don’t like the outcome. If we feel like the Human Rights Act isn’t appropriate, we should work with other countries to agree amendments.

I think we all know that removing the human rights act is a gross breech of the idiology behind the human rights act.

It ensures a globally recognised bar that all countries must meet in order to be fair and comparative.

Multinational human rights is better as it involves more nations and less likely to be created or altered to benefit one countries current government. Soo more likely to represent humanity.

No, the UK should not abolish the Human Rights Act. We all have rights as Humans regardless of what we do bad or good but saying that I do agree if someone has taken a life or killed multiple people like Terrorists, Gangs etc then I think it’s only fair they should be stripped of their rights and be dealt with accordingly to their crime they have committed.

Which rights don't you think we should have? We can always enshrine more in our own law, the only reason to repeal the HRA is to take people's rights away. Furthermore, the power of international agreements is the ability for us all to know, regardless of background that we think something is wrong. Opting out would make us international paraiahs.

No, what entitlemt does the UK have to have more control over human rights when in the past it has discriminated minorities,

The humans rights is a legislative piece of polticis designed to keep people world wide safe by meddling with it, an extremity will occur leading to a lack of safety for the everyday person.

Human Rights Act is a fundamental pillar to Human Rights in general. Change can often be good, and possible amendments to the Human Rights Act could technically happen with agreement from all political party spectrums. However, any change to essential human rights such as the right to education, to freedom from slavery and torture, right to life and freedom and more for ALL people young, old, rich, poor; cannot and should not be changed without positives for humans.

All human beings have a right to safety and equal treatment, however those who have committed serious crimes and are a danger to others should have some rights revoked as punishment

removing the human rights act will completely set us back 100 years, it will be a huge breech of the ideology of the human rights act

The Human rights act is integral to preserving our rights and out membership of the organisation is vital.