נסה את החידון הפוליטי

0 תשובה

 @T9Z296ירוקמקליפורניה Reading ענה…3 שנים3Y

There are several issues that have been rolled up in this issue. Firstly it is not about how much is spent on welfare benefits it is about what those on welfare need to survive. Poor housing leads to poor health physical and mental - However the cost of housing bears no relationship to its quality. We need to build council houses in expensive areas with rents affordable to people of limited means; Given we may never be able to build enough such house the actual rent charged should be means dependent.
The government should not be subsidizing private Industry but insisting that pay their staff a living wage. This would reduce the benefits bill. However all children, no matter the size of their family should get support from the state to ensure that they are not impoverished

 @T6F7S8UKIPמקליפורניה Reading ענה…3 שנים3Y

Replace working income for those with genuine health issues which mean they cannot work (with signed doctor approval), otherwise more reform so it supplements a working income.

 @T6F3Q2ליברלית דמוקרטיתמקליפורניה Liverpool ענה…3 שנים3Y

Loopholes should be closed but for those legitimately claiming it doesn't provide enough support, but should never replace a working income.

 @Q575QVמקליפורניה London, City of ענה…3 שנים3Y

Government should be doing more to relocate people with a desire to work and therefore reduce the overall burden of welfare on the rest of society.

 @Q55X8Jמקליפורניה Glasgow City ענה…3 שנים3Y

 @Q559PCמקליפורניה Edinburgh, City of ענה…3 שנים3Y

 @Q54W88מקליפורניה Kent ענה…3 שנים3Y

minimum wage should be significantly increased (perhaps varying by job type) in return no benefits paid to workers but instead money paid to businesses as a per employee-on-mimimum-wage incentive. The incentives to a businesses would reduce as the businesses became more profitable.

 @Q54D5Wמקליפורניה Lancashire ענה…3 שנים3Y

 @Q4NHNDמקליפורניה London, City of ענה…3 שנים3Y

 @Q4B8NJמקליפורניה North Lanarkshire ענה…3 שנים3Y

 @Q3WYQGמקליפורניה London, City of ענה…3 שנים3Y

There's no easy answer to benefits. SOme people in dire need slip through the cracks, other learn to play the system. And sudden cut-off caps and limits discourage people from moving into the jobs market because a little improvement in wages leads to a huge cut in benefits

 @PXFL6Rמקליפורניה Wokingham ענה…3 שנים3Y

 @PVZHQ5מקליפורניה Hampshire ענה…3 שנים3Y

The punitive restrictions should be less harsh, and used only when all other potential situations have been fully explored and reasonably implemented.
The financial assistance offered should be raised to a sensible level (one where people aren't left in needless poverty), and there should be more practical support than just financial aid offered to those that need it.