@ISIDEWITHप्रशनसामाजिक मुद्दे4yrs पहले

क्या अभद्र भाषा को भाषण कानूनों की स्वतंत्रता द्वारा संरक्षित किया जाना चाहिए?

इंग्लैंड और वेल्स में अभद्र भाषा के कानून कई विधियों में पाए जाते हैं। किसी व्यक्ति के रंग, जाति, लिंग, विकलांगता, राष्ट्रीयता (नागरिकता सहित), जातीय या राष्ट्रीय मूल, धर्म, लिंग पुनर्निर्धारण, या यौन अभिविन्यास के कारण किसी के प्रति घृणा की अभिव्यक्ति प्रतिबंधित है। कोई भी संचार जो धमकाने वाला या अपमानजनक है, और जिसका उद्देश्य किसी को परेशान करना, अलार्म देना या परेशान करना है, निषिद्ध है। अभद्र भाषा के लिए दंड में जुर्माना, कारावास, या दोनों शामिल हैं। पुलिस और सीपीएस ने घृणास्पद अपराधों और घृणास्पद घटनाओं की एक परिभाषा तैयार की है, जिसमें घृणास्पद भाषण इनका एक सबसेट है। अगर पीड़ित या किसी और को लगता है कि यह अक्षमता, जाति, धर्म, लिंग पहचान या यौन अभिविन्यास के आधार पर शत्रुता या पूर्वाग्रह से प्रेरित है, तो यह एक घृणास्पद घटना है। एक घृणास्पद घटना घृणा अपराध बन जाती है यदि वह अपराध की सीमा को पार कर जाती है।

+
विस्तार
+ सेटिंग्स x  

टॉगल वोटरबेस

इस जनसांख्यिकी के लिए आंकड़े दिखाए गए हैं

उत्तर अवलोकन

450 Southwark London मतदाताओं की प्रतिक्रिया दरें।

42%
हाँ
58%
नहीं
22%
हाँ
52%
नहीं
10%
हां, क्योंकि मुझे नफरत की भाषा की सीमाओं को परिभाषित करने के लिए सरकार पर भरोसा नहीं है
4%
नहीं, और अभद्र भाषा के लिए दंड में वृद्धि
10%
हां, जब तक यह हिंसा की धमकी नहीं देता है
3%
नहीं, भाषण कानूनों की स्वतंत्रता आपको केवल सरकार की आलोचना करने से बचाएगी

ऐतिहासिक समर्थन

450 Southwark London मतदाताओं से प्रत्येक उत्तर के लिए समय के साथ समर्थन का रुझान।

डेटा लोड हो रहा है...

चार्ट लोड हो रहा है... 

ऐतिहासिक महत्व

450 Southwark London मतदाताओं के लिए यह मुद्दा कितना महत्वपूर्ण है, इसका रुझान।

डेटा लोड हो रहा है...

चार्ट लोड हो रहा है... 

अन्य लोकप्रिय उत्तर

Southwark London मतदाताओं के अनोखे उत्तर, जिनके विचार उपलब्ध विकल्पों से परे थे।

ताजा खबर

"द्वेषपूर्ण भाषण” संबंधित नवीनतम समाचार लेखों से अपडेट रहें, जिन्हें अक्सर अपडेट किया जाता है।

 @ISIDEWITH प्रस्तुत…8मोस8MO

एलोन मस्क के साथ टकराव के बाद ब्राज़ील ने सोशल मीडिया को विनियमित करने की धमकी दी

Brazil’s attorney-general has demanded “urgent regulation” of social media sites after Elon Musk threatened to disobey a court order banning certain profiles on his X platform and then called for a Supreme Court justice to “resign or be impeached”.“It is urgent to regulate social networks,” said Jorge Messias.“We cannot live in a society in which billionaires domiciled abroad have control of social networks and put themselves in a position to violate the rule of law, failing to comply with court orders and threatening our authorities.”The comments came after X’s global government affairs team posted that it “has been forced by court decisions to block certain popular accounts in Brazil”. “We do not know the reasons these blocking orders have been issued [and] We are prohibited from saying which court or judge issued the order, or on what grounds.”The profiles are probably linked to far-right movements, which have found fertile ground on X and other social media platforms, including Telegram.Musk suggested the court orders came from Alexandre De Moraes, a Supreme Court justice who has been a vocal advocate of cracking down on anti-democratic content online, particularly following riots on January 8 last year when thousands of far-right demonstrators stormed government buildings in Brasília.Musk, the billionaire owner of X, vowed on Sunday to “publish everything demanded by [De Moraes] and how those requests violate Brazilian law”.He called for Moraes to “resign or be impeached” and said the judge had “brazenly and repeatedly betrayed the constitution and people of Brazil”.Musk, a self-declared free speech absolutist, bought X in late 2022 and quickly relaxed its moderation policies and reinstated several previously banned accounts. The moves have been welcomed by some on the right, but critics including civil rights groups have argued the platform is failing to adequately police hate speech and extremist content.Musk’s latest comments echo talking points of Brazil’s far-right, which has long accused De Moraes and the Supreme Court of censorship and running a “judicial dictatorship”.De Moraes is widely considered to have played a role in protecting Brazilian democracy during the 2022 presidential election, when the president at the time Jair Bolsonaro was spreading unsubstantiated claims about the integrity of the electoral system.De Moraes also took a hard line in the aftermath of the Brasília riots, handing down lengthy sentences and accusing the demonstrators of trying to launch a coup.Orlando Silva, a lawmaker aligned with the government, said Musk had disrespected the judiciary and that in response he would propose legislation setting out a “responsibilities regime for these digital platforms”.“We have reached a limit. It is a response in defence of Brazil,” he said.The extent of the threat to Brazilian democracy in 2022 was highlighted by a police investigation in February, which has alleged that Bolsonaro, in conjunction with several military officers, considered an armed intervention to prevent President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva from taking office. Bolsonaro denies the claims.As part of the alleged plot, Bolsonaro had De Moraes put under constant surveillance for weeks following the polls in October 2022, according to federal police.Social media platforms have faced increasing pressure to comply with new laws in countries such as India and Turkey, which can require them to take down content or face bans, fines or the imprisonment of staffers.Critics argue such rules are oppressive and can be abused by country leaders to silence dissidents and activists.Despite regularly espousing free speech ideals, Musk has previously come under fire from critics for appeasing censorship demands from various governments. More recently, however, X has taken to posting publicly about the requests they receive.