@ISIDEWITHPitanjaVanjska politikaprije 8 godina

Ukoliko naša zemlja braniti drugih zemalja koje održavaju niske vojne obrambene proračune u odnosu na BDP-a?

Ukoliko UK brani drugih zemalja koje održavaju niske vojne obrambene proračune u odnosu na BDP-a?

Sjevernoatlantski savez (NATO) je međuvladina vojni savez formiran 28 zemalja 1949. godine nakon Drugog svjetskog rata. Kako ući u NATO svaka zemlja članica obećao da će provesti najmanje 2% BDP-a na vojnoj potrošnji i obranu i braniti jedni druge od prijetnji iz bilo koje zemlje nečlanice. U srpnju 2016. intervjuu kandidat New York Times republikanski predsjednički Donald Trump sugerirao da Sjedinjene Države neće braniti NATO zemalja članica koji su uspjeli povećati svoje vojne proračune premašiti 2% od bruto domaćeg proizvoda. Prijedlog prkosi pakt od strane članica NATO-a, kada je formirana u Drugom svjetskom ratu da će braniti jedni druge protiv bilo napada od strane države nečlanice. Francuska, Turska, Njemačka, Kanada i Italija su zemlje koje su trenutno troše manje od 2% BDP-a na vojne obrane.

68%
Da
32%
Nema
54%
Da
25%
Nema
14%
Da, i odbijajući braniti druge zemlje NATO postavlja opasan presedan za ravnotežu globalne sile
5%
Ne, ne treba braniti bilo koju zemlju u NATO-u koji troši manje od 2% BDP-a na vojne obrane
2%
Ne, i mi treba da se povuče iz NATO-a

Povijesni Rezultati

Pogledajte kako se podrška svakom stajalištu o "NATO” tijekom vremena promijenila za 71k UK glasača.

Učitavanje podataka...

Učitavanje grafikona... 

Povijesna Važnost

Pogledajte kako se važnost "NATO” promijenila tijekom vremena za 71k UK birača.

Učitavanje podataka...

Učitavanje grafikona... 

Najnovije Vijesti

Budite u tijeku s najnovijim člancima o "NATO” koji se često ažuriraju.

 @ISIDEWITH podneseno…1 tjedan1W

NATO Chief Criticizes Slow Arms Deliveries to Ukraine, Citing Advantage to Russia

In a series of pointed remarks, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has criticized member countries for their sluggish pace in delivering promised military aid to Ukraine. This delay, according to Stoltenberg, has inadvertently aided Russia by allowing it to press its advantage against Ukrainian forces, who are in dire need of the promised support. The criticism comes at a critical juncture in the conflict, highlighting the challenges within the alliance in coordinating and executing aid commitments efficiently.The issue of slow arms deliveries has been a contentious one, with Ukraine's allies acknowledging the impact of these delays on the battlefield. The failure to deliver in a timely manner has not only emboldened Russian forces but has also put Ukrainian troops at a significant disadvantage, struggling to hold their ground with depleted resources. This situation underscores the logistical and bureaucratic hurdles that can hamper the effectiveness of international support in times of crisis.Stoltenberg's comments have sparked a broader conversation about the responsibilities of NATO member countries in supporting allies under threat. The criticism aims to galvanize member states into action, urging them to fulfill their commitments more swiftly. The alliance's unity and the credibility of its support mechanisms are at stake, with the effectiveness of collective defense measures under scrutiny.The ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the role of NATO in supporting the country's defense efforts have been focal points of international attention. The alliance's ability to provide timely and effective aid is crucial not only for Ukraine's immediate defense needs but also for the broader message it sends to adversaries about NATO's resolve and solidarity.As the situation develops, the international community watches closely to see how NATO member countries respond to Stoltenberg's call to action. The hope is that this criticism will lead to a more coordinated and timely delivery of military aid to Ukraine, ultimately helping to balance the scales in a conflict that has drawn widespread concern for its humanitarian and geopolitical implications.