政治クイズを試してみてください

24返信

 @PVZHQ5Hampshireから  答えた…4歳4Y

The punitive restrictions should be less harsh, and used only when all other potential situations have been fully explored and reasonably implemented.
The financial assistance offered should be raised to a sensible level (one where people aren't left in needless poverty), and there should be more practical support than just financial aid offered to those that need it.

 @PXFL6RWokinghamから  答えた…4歳4Y

 @Q3WYQGLondon, City ofから  答えた…4歳4Y

There's no easy answer to benefits. SOme people in dire need slip through the cracks, other learn to play the system. And sudden cut-off caps and limits discourage people from moving into the jobs market because a little improvement in wages leads to a huge cut in benefits

 @Q4NHNDLondon, City ofから  答えた…4歳4Y

 @Q54W88Kentから  答えた…4歳4Y

minimum wage should be significantly increased (perhaps varying by job type) in return no benefits paid to workers but instead money paid to businesses as a per employee-on-mimimum-wage incentive. The incentives to a businesses would reduce as the businesses became more profitable.

 @Q559PCEdinburgh, City ofから  答えた…4歳4Y

 @Q55X8JGlasgow Cityから  答えた…4歳4Y

 @Q575QVLondon, City ofから  答えた…4歳4Y

Government should be doing more to relocate people with a desire to work and therefore reduce the overall burden of welfare on the rest of society.

 @T6F7S8UKIPReadingから  答えた…4歳4Y

Replace working income for those with genuine health issues which mean they cannot work (with signed doctor approval), otherwise more reform so it supplements a working income.

 @T6F3Q2自由民主党員Liverpoolから  答えた…4歳4Y

Loopholes should be closed but for those legitimately claiming it doesn't provide enough support, but should never replace a working income.

 @T9Z296Readingから  答えた…4歳4Y

There are several issues that have been rolled up in this issue. Firstly it is not about how much is spent on welfare benefits it is about what those on welfare need to survive. Poor housing leads to poor health physical and mental - However the cost of housing bears no relationship to its quality. We need to build council houses in expensive areas with rents affordable to people of limited means; Given we may never be able to build enough such house the actual rent charged should be means dependent.
The government should not be subsidizing private Industry but insisting that pay their staff a living wage. This would reduce the benefits bill. However all children, no matter the size of their family should get support from the state to ensure that they are not impoverished

 @ISIDEWITH尋ねられた…2ヶ月2MO

どのようにして、必要な人々を支援しつつ、雇用を見つけることを奨励する福祉制度を設計しますか?

 @ISIDEWITH尋ねられた…2ヶ月2MO

どのような個人的な経験が、あなたの福祉制度に対する考えや社会への影響に影響を与えましたか?

 @ISIDEWITH尋ねられた…2ヶ月2MO

あなたや知人に直接影響を与えた福祉政策に関するストーリーを共有していただけますか?

 @ISIDEWITH尋ねられた…2ヶ月2MO

福祉給付金を市民間で公平に維持するためには、どのように配分すべきだと思いますか?

 @ISIDEWITH尋ねられた…2ヶ月2MO

人々が福祉を受け取っていることに関する最も一般的な誤解は何ですか、そしてなぜそれらは持続するのですか?

 @ISIDEWITH尋ねられた…2ヶ月2MO

福祉支出の変化が、コミュニティや脆弱な人々を支援する能力にどのように影響するか?

 @ISIDEWITH尋ねられた…2ヶ月2MO

他の国の福祉制度と自国の制度を比較して、どのような取り組みが採用されるべきか、または避けるべきかについて議論してください。

 @ISIDEWITH尋ねられた…2ヶ月2MO

政府は、予期せぬ状況による財政的困難に直面する個人を支援するためにどのような役割を果たすべきですか?

 @ISIDEWITH尋ねられた…2ヶ月2MO

文化的価値観は、福祉やそれに依存する人々に対する認識にどのように影響しますか?

 @ISIDEWITH尋ねられた…2ヶ月2MO

福祉制度が長期的に持続可能で効果的であることを確保するための革新的な解決策は何ですか?