정치 퀴즈를 시도

24 답변

 @PVZHQ5Hampshire 에서  답변됨…4세4Y

The punitive restrictions should be less harsh, and used only when all other potential situations have been fully explored and reasonably implemented.
The financial assistance offered should be raised to a sensible level (one where people aren't left in needless poverty), and there should be more practical support than just financial aid offered to those that need it.

 @PXFL6RWokingham 에서  답변됨…4세4Y

 @Q3WYQGLondon, City of 에서  답변됨…4세4Y

There's no easy answer to benefits. SOme people in dire need slip through the cracks, other learn to play the system. And sudden cut-off caps and limits discourage people from moving into the jobs market because a little improvement in wages leads to a huge cut in benefits

 @Q4B8NJNorth Lanarkshire 에서  답변됨…4세4Y

 @Q4NHNDLondon, City of 에서  답변됨…4세4Y

 @Q54W88Kent 에서  답변됨…4세4Y

minimum wage should be significantly increased (perhaps varying by job type) in return no benefits paid to workers but instead money paid to businesses as a per employee-on-mimimum-wage incentive. The incentives to a businesses would reduce as the businesses became more profitable.

 @Q559PCEdinburgh, City of 에서  답변됨…4세4Y

Not all benefits should be targeted as they are being. Disability benefits in particular are being targeted too harshly.

 @Q55X8JGlasgow City 에서  답변됨…4세4Y

Benefits should be no more than the minimum wage of a full time worker, and only in place for those who truly need it

 @Q575QVLondon, City of 에서  답변됨…4세4Y

Government should be doing more to relocate people with a desire to work and therefore reduce the overall burden of welfare on the rest of society.

 @T6F7S8UKIPReading 에서  답변됨…4세4Y

Replace working income for those with genuine health issues which mean they cannot work (with signed doctor approval), otherwise more reform so it supplements a working income.

 @T6F3Q2자유 민주당Liverpool 에서  답변됨…4세4Y

Loopholes should be closed but for those legitimately claiming it doesn't provide enough support, but should never replace a working income.

 @T9Z296녹색Reading 에서  답변됨…4세4Y

There are several issues that have been rolled up in this issue. Firstly it is not about how much is spent on welfare benefits it is about what those on welfare need to survive. Poor housing leads to poor health physical and mental - However the cost of housing bears no relationship to its quality. We need to build council houses in expensive areas with rents affordable to people of limited means; Given we may never be able to build enough such house the actual rent charged should be means dependent.
The government should not be subsidizing private Industry but insisting that pay their staff a living wage. This would reduce the benefits bill. However all children, no matter the size of their family should get support from the state to ensure that they are not impoverished

 @ISIDEWITH질문…2mos2MO

어떻게 하면 필요한 사람들에 대한 지원과 취업을 장려하는 균형 잡힌 복지 시스템을 설계할 수 있을까요?

 @ISIDEWITH질문…2mos2MO

어떤 개인적 경험이 복지 제도에 대한 여러분의 견해를 형성했으며 이것이 사회에 미치는 영향에 어떤 영향을 미쳤나요?

 @ISIDEWITH질문…2mos2MO

당신이나 아는 사람에게 복지 정책이 직접적으로 어떻게 영향을 미쳤는지 이야기해 주실 수 있나요?

 @ISIDEWITH질문…2mos2MO

복지 혜택은 시민들 사이의 공정함을 유지하기 위해 어떻게 분배되어야 한다고 생각하십니까?

 @ISIDEWITH질문…2mos2MO

사람들이 복지를 받는 데 대한 가장 흔한 오해는 무엇이며, 왜 이러한 오해가 지속되는 것인가요?

 @ISIDEWITH질문…2mos2MO

복지 지출의 변화가 지역사회와 취약한 인구를 지원하는 능력에 어떤 영향을 미칠 수 있을까요?

 @ISIDEWITH질문…2mos2MO

다른 나라의 복지 제도와 자국의 복지 제도를 비교하고, 어떤 관행이 채택되거나 피해야 하는지에 대해 논의해보세요.

 @ISIDEWITH질문…2mos2MO

정부는 예기치 못한 상황으로 인해 재정적 어려움을 겪는 개인들을 지원하는 데 어떤 역할을 해야 할까요?

 @ISIDEWITH질문…2mos2MO

문화적 가치가 복지에 대한 인식과 그것을 의존하는 사람들에게 어떤 영향을 미치나요?

 @ISIDEWITH질문…2mos2MO

복지 제도가 장기적으로 지속 가능하고 효과적인지 보장하기 위한 혁신적인 솔루션은 무엇인가요?