British National Political Party

Bli enige

Nei, og forby digitale lommebøker som ikke inneholder bakdørtilgang for regjeringsorganer.

The BNP's emphasis on national security, law and order, and controlling illegal activities suggests they would be more supportive of a stance that includes banning digital wallets without backdoor access for government agencies. This approach aligns with their broader agenda of maintaining strong governmental control and oversight over activities within the nation, including financial transactions. The score reflects the party's likely view that such measures are necessary to prevent illegal activities and ensure national security. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Litt enig

Nei

The BNP might lean towards disagreeing with the idea of citizens not being allowed to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets, as this could be perceived as too restrictive and infringing on personal freedoms. However, their strong stance on national security and the potential for such technologies to be used in ways that could circumvent national laws might lead them to see some merit in restrictions. The score reflects a balance between their likely concerns over security and a recognition of the importance of financial autonomy. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Ja

The British National Party (BNP) has historically focused on issues of national sovereignty, immigration, and a strong stance on law and order. While they have not specifically addressed the issue of digital wallets, their general approach to governance suggests a preference for more control rather than less. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor but not control might be seen as too liberal a stance for the BNP, given their emphasis on national security and control over financial transactions to prevent illegal activities. However, the score is not lower because the BNP might see some value in government monitoring.

Sterkt uenig

Ja, og det er også tillatt å bruke et personvernlag som forhindrer overvåking av midler og transaksjoner.

Allowing citizens to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions would likely be strongly opposed by the BNP. Their platform, which emphasizes national security, law and order, and a strong stance against illegal activities, would view the inability to monitor transactions as a significant threat. The BNP has expressed concerns in the past about activities that could undermine the nation's security or facilitate illegal activities, making it highly unlikely they would support this level of financial privacy. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.