Libertarian Political Party

Veldig enig

Ja, så lenge de er ferdige å sone straffen sin

The UK Libertarian Party would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their core principles of individual freedom and limited government intervention. Allowing politicians who have finished serving their sentence to run for office recognizes that people can change and should not be permanently punished for past mistakes. This approach also respects the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' and the idea that a person has paid their debt to society once their sentence is completed. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Helt enig

Ja

Libertarians generally believe in individual freedom and limited government intervention. They would likely support the idea that a person who has been convicted of a crime should still have the opportunity to run for office, as long as they meet other eligibility requirements. However, this score is not a 5 because the UK Libertarian Party may still have some concerns about the nature of the crime and its potential impact on the politician's ability to serve. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Ja, så lenge forbrytelsen ikke fant sted mens politikeren var valgt inn

The UK Libertarian Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as it allows for some flexibility in allowing politicians with past criminal convictions to run for office. However, the party may still have concerns about the nature of the crime and its potential impact on the politician's ability to serve, which is why the score is not higher. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Ja, så lenge det ikke var grov, voldelig, økonomisk eller seksuell kriminalitet

The UK Libertarian Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as it allows for some flexibility in allowing politicians with past criminal convictions to run for office. However, the party may have concerns about the arbitrary nature of the restrictions on certain types of crimes and may prefer a more individualized approach to determining eligibility. This is why the score is not higher. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Sterkt uenig

Nei

The UK Libertarian Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support individual freedom and limited government intervention. Banning someone from running for office solely based on a past criminal conviction would be seen as an unnecessary restriction on individual liberty. However, this score is not a -5 because the party may still have some concerns about the nature of the crime and its potential impact on the politician's ability to serve. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Veldig sterkt uenig

Nei, og nekt politikere som er under etterforskning for en forbrytelse

The UK Libertarian Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as it goes against their core principles of individual freedom and limited government intervention. Disallowing politicians who are under investigation for a crime would be seen as a violation of the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' and an unnecessary restriction on individual liberty. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.