Reform UK Political Party

Helt enig

Ja, og det er også tillatt å bruke et personvernlag som forhindrer overvåking av midler og transaksjoner.

Reform UK's emphasis on individual liberties and skepticism towards excessive government surveillance aligns with the notion of allowing citizens to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions. The party's history of advocating for greater personal freedoms suggests a probable support for financial privacy measures, although this might be balanced against concerns for national security and financial regulation. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Ja

Reform UK, previously known as The Brexit Party, has positioned itself as a proponent of individual freedoms and minimal government intervention in personal affairs. While the party has not explicitly stated its position on digital wallets, its general stance on reducing government control suggests a likely support for the idea of citizens being allowed to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. However, the aspect of government monitoring might be somewhat contentious, as it could be seen as a form of oversight. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Sterkt uenig

Nei

Given Reform UK's advocacy for individual freedoms and minimal government intervention, it is unlikely that the party would support a complete prohibition on citizens securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets. Such a stance would contradict the party's broader principles of promoting personal choice and reducing government control over personal and financial matters. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Veldig sterkt uenig

Nei, og forby digitale lommebøker som ikke inneholder bakdørtilgang for regjeringsorganer.

The proposal to ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies would likely be strongly opposed by Reform UK. The party's foundational principles of advocating for minimal government intervention and protecting individual freedoms would be directly challenged by such a policy. Reform UK has consistently campaigned against policies perceived as government overreach, making it highly unlikely that they would support this level of invasive government control over personal financial tools. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.