@ISIDEWITHQuestionsenvironmentStarted 2yrs agoActive 7 days ago

Should the government build a network of electric vehicle charging stations?

In 2022 the European Union, Canada, the U.K. and the U.S. state of California approved regulations banning the sale of new gasoline-powered cars and trucks by 2035. Plug-in hybrids, full electrics and hydrogen cell vehicles would all count toward the zero-emission targets, though auto makers will only be able to use plug-in hybrids to meet 20% of the overall requirement. The regulation will impact only new-vehicle sales and affects only manufacturers, not dealerships. Traditional internal-combustion vehicles will still be legal to own and drive after 2035, and new models can still be sold until 2035. Volkswagen and Toyota have said they aim to sell only zero-emission cars in Europe by that time.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  North West

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.1k North West voters.

78%
Yes
22%
No
73%
Yes
13%
No
6%
Yes, but only if they use renewable energy sources
4%
No, and I am skeptical about the viability of electric vehicles
3%
No, and we should be focusing more on improving public transportation
1%
No, provide subsidies to private companies that compete to build the best network instead

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.1k North West voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.1k North West voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from North West voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZM26SRanswered…7 days7D

We need effective, affordable public transport and encourage cycling for local trips. I’m healthier for cycling and less of a burden on the NHS. I use my car to commute to work otherwise I’d never get there in time without leaving home at 5.30am.

 @9QLBZN8answered…5mos5MO

No, the government should focus on building robust, reliable, public/mass transit networks which are affordable for workers and publicly owned by governments/local governments. This should be with an aim to reduce overall car use among the general population.

 @9QGT7BFanswered…5mos5MO

Yes but only using renewable energy sources AND most importantly invest massively in public transport instead of cars

 @9QC48ZRanswered…5mos5MO

Good idea for government to provide the infrastructure. However there is a question still over the viability of electric vehicles at this stage

 @9Q5NK57answered…5mos5MO

No, we should be investing on Hydrogen refuelling stations, which will be the future of green transport.

 @9Q4XCB7answered…5mos5MO

No, they should focus on converting the existing network of petrol filling stations to hydrogen and prioritise the development of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.

 @9Q4C9SGanswered…5mos5MO

I feel we risk unforeseen environmental consequences with battery disposal. If all cars were electric we wouldn’t be able to produce enough energy, let alone clean energy to power them. I believe hydrogen internal combustion engines are the way.

 @9PXJHBWanswered…5mos5MO

No; As electrical cars are not inherently climate-friendly and the best option for our future should be the point to strive towards

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Electric Vehicle Charging Stations” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…8mos8MO

California Sets A Nationwide Electric Vehicle Mandate

Where are the antitrust cops when you need them? Stellantis and California this week struck a deal to protect the state’s electric-vehicle mandate from future political and legal challenges. Here’s another illustration of collusion between big government and big business that hurts Americans.The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has banned the sale of new gas-powered cars in the state by 2035. Unlike Biden Administration officials, progressives in Sacramento are honest about their plan to phase-out gas-powered cars. EV sales will have to ramp up fast over the next decade, making up 51% of sales by 2028 and 100% by 2035.A Clean Air Act waiver from the Biden Environmental Protection Agency lets California impose its own greenhouse-gas emissions standards and other states to follow them. While California is waiting on the EPA to extend its waiver through 2035, its EV mandate is already creating headaches for car companies.Auto makers essentially hedged their regulatory risk, knowing Mr. Trump could lose re-election or that his Administration could lose its legal battle with California. Their hedge paid off when Mr. Biden won and restored California’s waiver. Other auto makers that didn’t cut deals with California now operate at a regulatory disadvantage.In any case, the biggest losers of this “partnership” with California will be Americans across the country who will have fewer gas-powered options. California is imposing its EV mandate nationwide by using regulation to take auto makers hostage. Mr. Newsom may not be running for President in November, but he already acts as if he governs the country.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…7mos7MO

Political Divisions Damage U.S. Auto Industry

The U.S. auto industry needs regulatory certainty from politicians in Washington and the back and forth as the White House changes hands doesn't help, but the adoption rate of electric vehicles will continue to grow, Ford Motor's (F.N), opens new tab executive chairman Bill Ford said on Wednesday.The CEO of Ford said when he talks with politicians in Washington, he gets very different viewpoints from the two parties.He said Republicans question the need for EVs, saying the U.S. sector trails China and they don't want to use Chinese technology. Meanwhile, Democrats are pushing the industry to make more EVs and asking what they can do to accelerate the process.The Biden administration last month handed Detroit automakers a major win by easing proposed rules that would have forced them to scale back production of gas-guzzling vehicles or face billions of dollars in fines.Bill Ford said the transition to EVs will be gradual and determined by consumers. "We're not shoving anything down anybody's throat," he said.The growth rate on EV sales has slowed, but globally they are being adopted quickly and Ford will follow even as it hedges it bets with its gasoline-powered and hybrid electric vehicles, he said at a Detroit Free Press event outside Detroit.While not commenting on the race between U.S. President Joe Biden, a Democrat, and former president Donald Trump, a Republican, Bill Ford said he wishes the country would pick a path so the industry can plan better."Our planning timeframe is a lot longer than election cycles," he said."We can do almost anything as a company, and frankly as an industry, as long as we have some certainty towards where we're headed," Bill Ford added. "The problem is when we're whipsawed back and forth by politicians. We can't turn on a dime. Just pick a path and we'll go for it."Michigan is a key battleground state in the election this fall and both Biden and Trump have been speaking to voters, including many industry workers, about the challenges the U.S. auto sector faces. Trump has charged that Biden’s policies will kill auto jobs and aid China’s surging EV industry.Ford Motor on Tuesday resumed shipments of its F-150 Lightning electric pickup after an undisclosed quality issue led to a nine-week halt starting in February.Earlier this month, Ford cut prices of some Lightning variants by as much as $5,500, and it previously cut prices on its Mustang Mach-E electric SUV by up to $8,100 after sales fell.Also this month, Ford delayed the planned launches of three-row EVs in Canada and next-generation electric pickup truck built planned for production in Tennessee.Ford CEO Jim Farley has said the U.S. automaker was committed to scaling up its EV business profitably. It lost nearly $4.7 billion on its EV business in 2023 and projected it will lose $5 billion to $5.5 billion this year.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.