În 2021/22, guvernul Regatului Unit va cheltui aproximativ 216 miliarde de lire sterline pentru beneficii, o creștere de aproximativ trei milioane de lire sterline în comparație cu anul precedent. Un singur adult șomer în vârstă de 25 de ani sau peste primește o plată lunară de beneficiu de 325 de lire sterline (439 USD). În ianuarie 2022, guvernul britanic a anunțat că va înăspri regulile pentru unele persoane care solicită ajutor de șomaj. În prezent, persoanele aflate în căutarea unui loc de muncă care primesc beneficii de stat pot petrece până la trei luni căutând doar un loc de muncă similar cu locul lor anterior, dar acesta va fi redus în curând la patru săptămâni, a spus Departamentul pentru Muncă și Pensii.
There are several issues that have been rolled up in this issue. Firstly it is not about how much is spent on welfare benefits it is about what those on welfare need to survive. Poor housing leads to poor health physical and mental - However the cost of housing bears no relationship to its quality. We need to build council houses in expensive areas with rents affordable to people of limited means; Given we may never be able to build enough such house the actual rent charged should be means dependent.
The government should not be subsidizing private Industry but insisting that pay their staff a living wage. This would reduce the benefits bill. However all children, no matter the size of their family should get support from the state to ensure that they are not impoverished
Replace working income for those with genuine health issues which mean they cannot work (with signed doctor approval), otherwise more reform so it supplements a working income.
@T6F3Q2Liberal Democrat3 ani3Y
Loopholes should be closed but for those legitimately claiming it doesn't provide enough support, but should never replace a working income.
@Q575QV3 ani3Y
Government should be doing more to relocate people with a desire to work and therefore reduce the overall burden of welfare on the rest of society.
@Q55X8J3 ani3Y
Benefits should be no more than the minimum wage of a full time worker, and only in place for those who truly need it
@Q559PC3 ani3Y
Not all benefits should be targeted as they are being. Disability benefits in particular are being targeted too harshly.
@Q54W883 ani3Y
minimum wage should be significantly increased (perhaps varying by job type) in return no benefits paid to workers but instead money paid to businesses as a per employee-on-mimimum-wage incentive. The incentives to a businesses would reduce as the businesses became more profitable.
@Q54D5W3 ani3Y
Benefits should be case based with greater one-to-one care and attention
@Q4NHND3 ani3Y
Criteria for claiming should be reviewed and we have to create more jobs and jobs with a living wage
@Q4B8NJ3 ani3Y
There should be much more scrutiny of claimants both deserving and undeserving.
@Q3WYQG3 ani3Y
There's no easy answer to benefits. SOme people in dire need slip through the cracks, other learn to play the system. And sudden cut-off caps and limits discourage people from moving into the jobs market because a little improvement in wages leads to a huge cut in benefits
@PYKZLQ3 ani3Y
@PXFL6R3 ani3Y
Looking for fraud in the benefit system should be confined to just that, not penalising everyone.
@PVZHQ53 ani3Y
The punitive restrictions should be less harsh, and used only when all other potential situations have been fully explored and reasonably implemented.
The financial assistance offered should be raised to a sensible level (one where people aren't left in needless poverty), and there should be more practical support than just financial aid offered to those that need it.