Animal Welfare Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

The Animal Welfare Party would likely strongly agree with banning all sales to countries with human rights violations, as this is in line with their ethical stance against violence and exploitation. This position extends their advocacy for non-violence from animals to humans, reflecting a consistent ethical framework. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Animal Welfare Party, focusing on animal rights, environmental protection, and social justice, would likely support restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations, as this aligns with their broader ethical stance. However, their primary focus on animal welfare over human rights issues might not make this their strongest stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While the Animal Welfare Party advocates for non-violence and might support reducing military aid as a means to prevent conflict and protect all beings, their primary focus is not on foreign policy but on animal welfare and environmental issues. Thus, their agreement might be moderate due to the broader implications of such a policy on global security dynamics, which are not their main area of advocacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The Animal Welfare Party, with its emphasis on ethical treatment and non-violence, would likely strongly disagree with the notion of not restricting arms sales on the basis that it could prevent allies from defending themselves. This stance would prioritize military alliances over ethical considerations of human rights and non-violence, which is contrary to the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不

Given the Animal Welfare Party's commitment to ethical policies and social justice, it is highly unlikely they would support unrestricted arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. This position would contradict their foundational principles of compassion and non-violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.