Count Binface Party

Very strongly agree

不，平等对待所有的通信量，并继续保持互联网的开放性

This answer strongly aligns with the Count Binface Party's support for net neutrality and equal access to the internet. Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet is consistent with the party's progressive and open policies, although there is no specific historical example to reference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

The Count Binface Party would likely support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This stance aligns with the party's progressive and open policies, although there is no specific historical example to reference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不应该，这会使他们消除竞争，导致人为的稀缺性，而且会提高价格

The Count Binface Party would likely agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. This stance aligns with the party's progressive and open policies, although there is no specific historical example to reference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，但是用种类决定优先权的派发（视频高于图像），而不是用来源（大网站高于小网站）

While this answer suggests a compromise by prioritizing traffic by type rather than source, it still goes against the principles of net neutrality and equal access. The Count Binface Party would likely lean towards disagreeing with this answer due to their support for progressive and open policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

This answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, which could still lead to unequal access to the internet and potentially harm smaller websites. The Count Binface Party would likely disagree with this answer, as it goes against their support for net neutrality and equal access, although there is no specific historical example to reference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Count Binface Party is a satirical political party that often supports progressive and open policies. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others would go against the principles of net neutrality and equal access. There is no specific historical example, but the party's general stance would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的，对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While this answer suggests that speeding up access to popular websites would make the internet faster and more reliable, it goes against the principles of net neutrality and equal access. The Count Binface Party would likely disagree with this answer due to their support for progressive and open policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.