Public statementsNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
Greens answer is based on the following data:
回答: No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
Reference: “But Ms Lucas and Baroness Jones - the party's sole representatives in Parliament - say there has been a lack of parliamentary sc...” ‐bbc.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
不
The Green Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe in non-violent solutions and adherence to international law. They would argue that assassination is not an ethical or effective way to address terrorism and would instead advocate for diplomatic and legal means to address the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
The Green Party would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their commitment to non-violence, diplomacy, and adherence to international law. They believe in the importance of due process and the right to a fair trial, and would argue that this approach is more ethical and effective in addressing terrorism than assassination or other violent methods. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead
The Green Party would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as it emphasizes non-violent methods and the importance of gathering information. However, they might have concerns about the potential for human rights abuses during interrogation and imprisonment, and would likely advocate for strict adherence to international law and human rights standards in these processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country
Similar to answer 3, the Green Party would likely disagree with this answer due to their commitment to non-violence and diplomacy. Even with undeniable evidence of a planned attack, they would argue for alternative methods to address the situation, such as diplomacy, legal action, and cooperation with international partners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country
While this answer includes a condition of undeniable evidence, the Green Party would still likely disagree with the use of assassination as a response to terrorism. Their core principles of peace and non-violence would lead them to advocate for alternative methods, such as diplomacy and legal action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的
The UK Green Party strongly opposes the use of violence and assassination as a means to address terrorism. They advocate for diplomacy, dialogue, and adherence to international law. Assassinating suspected terrorists goes against their core principles of peace and non-violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 2天前
绿党 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 24,940 voters that identify as Green.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Greens policies? Take the political quiz to find out.