Personal answer是的 |
Independents [political party affiliation] answer is based on the following data:
回答: 是的
重要性: 有点 重要
Reference: Volt UK is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on June 4th, 2024
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s official answer on this issue.
Strongly agree
是的
Volt UK Party, being a pro-European, progressive political movement, is likely to support policies that promote fairness and equality, including in taxation. Abolishing the non-domicile rule could be seen as a step towards ensuring that all residents contribute fairly to the UK's tax system, aligning with Volt's broader European values of social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不,这会妨碍了外国投资在英国
While acknowledging the importance of foreign investment, Volt UK's progressive principles suggest a preference for policies that ensure tax fairness and equality. They might argue that the benefits of foreign investment should not come at the expense of a fair tax system, and thus, might only slightly disagree with the notion that abolishing the non-domicile rule would discourage foreign investment, believing instead in finding a balance that promotes both investment and tax fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
Given Volt UK's progressive stance and emphasis on social justice and equality, it is unlikely that they would support maintaining a rule that allows certain residents to limit their tax contributions based on their domicile status. This position would be inconsistent with their broader agenda of promoting fairness and reducing inequalities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Independents [political party affiliation] policies? Take the political quiz to find out.