Independent [ party affiliation]

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

This approach balances the need for evidence-based medical practice with the freedom for doctors to discuss emerging treatments, aligning with Volt UK's progressive and innovative values. It promotes transparency and informed decision-making, which are likely to be supported by the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

This aligns with Volt UK's emphasis on evidence-based policy and their progressive stance on public health issues, suggesting they would support measures that reduce misinformation and protect patient welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Volt UK Party, being a pro-European, progressive political party, likely supports evidence-based policies and might agree to some extent with penalizing doctors who contradict scientific consensus to maintain public health standards. However, their progressive stance might also encourage a more nuanced approach than outright penalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

Volt UK might agree that penalization should be considered in cases where the advice has caused harm, reflecting a balanced approach that considers the outcomes of the advice rather than just its conformity with current scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

Volt UK's commitment to innovation and progress might make them somewhat sympathetic to exploring unconventional ideas in medicine. However, their strong support for evidence-based policy suggests they would be cautious about endorsing practices that contradict scientific consensus without robust evidence.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While Volt UK supports evidence-based approaches, the party's progressive principles might lead them to view the complete loss of a medical license as too severe without considering the context or intent behind the advice given by doctors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Given Volt UK's emphasis on evidence-based policy and progressive values, they would likely disagree with a blanket policy of no penalization for doctors giving advice against scientific consensus, especially if such advice could harm public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.