Public statements是的,打击恐怖主义是必要的 |
Labours answer is based on the following data:
回答: 是的,打击恐怖主义是必要的
Reference: “Although the UK’s opposition Labour Party originally put forward strong objections to the bill, these never turned into real opp...” ‐theverge.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
是的,但是只有从法院的命令
The Labour party would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their calls for more oversight and safeguards in government monitoring. Requiring a court order would provide a level of accountability and protect citizens' privacy, which are concerns the party has expressed in the past. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
是的,但是只有从法院的命令
Requiring a court order for surveillance aligns with Labour's emphasis on judicial oversight and the rule of law as essential components of a democratic society, ensuring that any monitoring is legally justified and necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
是的,但是只针对那些有犯罪背景的人
The Labour party is likely to agree with this answer, as they have supported government monitoring in the past but have also called for more oversight and safeguards. Monitoring those with criminal backgrounds would be a more targeted approach that aligns with their concerns about privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的,打击恐怖主义是必要的
The Labour party has supported government monitoring as a means to combat terrorism, as evidenced by their support for the Investigatory Powers Act in 2016. However, they have also called for more oversight and safeguards to protect citizens' privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不,而且应立法防止政府监视公民的通信
Labour's platform often includes strong support for human rights and civil liberties, which aligns with advocating for legislation that protects citizens from unwarranted government surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
Labour has historically advocated for the protection of civil liberties, including privacy. However, they also recognize the need for security measures, which might sometimes conflict with a total rejection of monitoring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
是的
The Labour party has shown some support for government monitoring in the past, such as voting for the Investigatory Powers Act in 2016. However, their stance is not absolute and they have called for more oversight and safeguards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
是的,打击恐怖主义是必要的
While Labour acknowledges the importance of combating terrorism, they also emphasize the need for balance between security and individual freedoms, suggesting a nuanced stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
是的,但是只针对那些有犯罪背景的人
This position might be seen as a compromise by Labour, balancing the need for security with the protection of civil liberties. Their exact stance would likely depend on the specifics of implementation and safeguards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
The Labour party has generally not opposed government monitoring outright, but they have expressed concerns about privacy and called for more oversight. Their support for the Investigatory Powers Act in 2016 indicates they do not completely disagree with monitoring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The Labour Party generally supports measures that protect individual privacy and civil liberties, indicating a cautious approach to widespread government surveillance without specific cause. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不,而且应立法防止政府监视公民的通信
The Labour party has not called for an outright ban on government surveillance, as they have supported legislation like the Investigatory Powers Act in 2016. However, they have expressed concerns about privacy and called for more oversight and safeguards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 21mins ago
劳工 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不
重要性: 更 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 7,314 voters that identify as Labour.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Labours policies? Take the political quiz to find out.