Public statementsNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
Labours answer is based on the following data:
回答: No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
Reference: “Because they are the ultimate in sanitised warfare where you immunise yourself against the reality of it, knowing full well that...” ‐co.uk
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
The Labour Party strongly agrees with capturing and giving suspected terrorists a fair trial, as this approach aligns with their commitment to human rights, due process, and adherence to international law. For example, they have consistently advocated for closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility and ensuring fair trials for detainees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead
The Labour Party is more likely to agree with capturing, interrogating, and imprisoning suspected terrorists instead of assassinating them. This approach aligns with their preference for diplomacy, negotiation, and adherence to international law. For example, they have criticized the UK's involvement in drone strikes and called for more transparency in counter-terrorism operations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
The Labour Party is more likely to agree with not assassinating suspected terrorists in foreign countries, as they generally advocate for diplomacy and adherence to international law. However, this score is not a strong agreement because the party's stance may vary depending on the specific context and leadership. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country
The Labour Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they would likely support taking action against terrorists who have committed attacks against the UK. However, they would still prefer diplomatic and legal approaches over assassination, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country
The Labour Party's stance on this answer would likely depend on the specific context and leadership. While they might support taking action against terrorists planning attacks, they generally prefer diplomatic and legal approaches over assassination. The score is neutral because their position could vary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的
The UK Labour Party generally opposes extrajudicial killings and assassination of suspected terrorists. They tend to prioritize diplomacy, negotiation, and adherence to international law. For example, under Jeremy Corbyn's leadership, the party criticized the UK's involvement in drone strikes against ISIS. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 10小时前
劳工 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 55,000 voters that identify as Labour.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Labours policies? Take the political quiz to find out.