Public statements不 |
Liberal Democrats answer is based on the following data:
回答: 不
Reference: “The Liberal Democrats have also pledged to increase non-dom charges and reform eligibility criteria, saying this could raise an ...” ‐bbc.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Strongly agree
是的
The Liberal Democrats have historically supported tax reforms that promote fairness and transparency. In 2015, their party manifesto included a pledge to review the non-domicile rule and consider replacing it with a principle-based system. While they have not explicitly called for the complete abolition of the rule, their stance suggests they would lean towards supporting such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不,这会妨碍了外国投资在英国
While the Liberal Democrats may be concerned about the potential impact on foreign investment, their focus on tax fairness and transparency suggests that they would not prioritize this concern over addressing the non-domicile rule. However, since they have not explicitly called for the rule's abolition, it is possible that they may consider the potential impact on foreign investment when evaluating alternatives to the current system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
As mentioned earlier, the Liberal Democrats have shown interest in reviewing and potentially replacing the non-domicile rule. This indicates that they would likely disagree with maintaining the status quo and not abolishing the rule. However, since they have not explicitly called for its abolition, the score is not at the extreme end of disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 24hrs ago
自由派民主党人 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 406 voters that identify as Liberal Democrat.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Liberal Democrats policies? Take the political quiz to find out.