ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
People Before Profit’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格
People Before Profit would strongly agree with this statement as they believe in promoting competition and preventing artificial scarcity. They would argue that allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites would lead to increased prices and reduced choice for consumers, which goes against their core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不
People Before Profit would strongly agree with this statement as they believe in equal access to information and resources for everyone. They would argue that allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites would create an unfair advantage for those who can afford to pay higher rates, while disadvantaging smaller websites and users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性
People Before Profit would strongly agree with this statement as they believe in maintaining the openness of the internet and treating all traffic equally. They would argue that this approach promotes fairness, competition, and equal access to information and resources for everyone. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)
People Before Profit would likely disagree with this statement, as it still allows for prioritization of certain types of content over others. While it may be less discriminatory than prioritizing based on source, it still has the potential to create an unequal internet landscape, which goes against their core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候
People Before Profit would likely disagree with this statement, as it still allows for ISPs to prioritize certain websites based on their ability to pay for higher quality. This approach would create an unequal internet landscape, disadvantaging smaller websites and users who cannot afford to pay for higher quality, which goes against their core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的
People Before Profit would strongly disagree with this statement as they prioritize equality and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal internet landscape, which goes against their core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。
People Before Profit would strongly disagree with this statement as they prioritize equality and fairness over potential improvements in speed and reliability. They would argue that the potential benefits of faster internet for some users do not outweigh the negative consequences of creating an unequal internet landscape. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People Before Profit’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.