ChatGPT不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收 |
People Before Profit’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收
People Before Profit supports increasing taxes on large multinational corporations as a means to fund public services and reduce inequality. They believe that corporations should contribute more to society and help fund essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不
People Before Profit opposes cuts to public spending and instead supports increased investment in public services, education, healthcare, and infrastructure to improve the lives of citizens and reduce inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代
People Before Profit supports efforts to end tax evasion as a means to increase government revenue and fund public services. They believe that closing tax loopholes and cracking down on tax evasion would help reduce inequality and provide necessary funding for essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,增加对富人的税收来替代
People Before Profit supports increasing taxes on the wealthy as a means to fund public services and reduce inequality. They believe that the wealthy should contribute more to society and help fund essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响
People Before Profit believes that cuts to public spending would negatively affect the economy by reducing the quality of public services and increasing inequality. They argue that investing in public services and infrastructure would stimulate economic growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不,换成减少军事费用。
People Before Profit has expressed support for reducing military spending and reallocating those funds to public services and social programs. They believe that the UK should prioritize the well-being of its citizens over military expenditures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
不,减少政府官员的数量来替代
While People Before Profit may support reducing the number of government officials as a cost-saving measure, their primary focus is on opposing cuts to public spending and advocating for increased investment in public services and infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资
While People Before Profit may support reducing benefits and salaries of government officials, their primary focus is on opposing cuts to public spending and advocating for increased investment in public services and infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,还有增加税收
While People Before Profit supports increasing taxes, they strongly oppose cuts to public spending. They believe that increased taxes should be used to fund public services and reduce inequality, rather than to reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的
People Before Profit strongly opposes cuts to public spending, as they believe it would harm public services and worsen inequality. They advocate for increased investment in public services and infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构
People Before Profit is a UK-based political party and does not focus on the US Constitution. They oppose cuts to public spending and instead advocate for increased investment in public services and infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People Before Profit’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.