Reclaim Party

Strongly agree

是的和父母必须以声称英国永久居民

The Reclaim Party has a strong focus on national identity and prioritizing UK citizens. Restricting child benefits to a maximum of two children and requiring parents to be permanent residents of the UK aligns with their principles of fiscal responsibility and prioritizing UK citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Reclaim Party has not explicitly stated their stance on child benefits, but they generally advocate for fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending. Restricting child benefits to a maximum of two children could align with these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的但是，增加到三个孩子

While the Reclaim Party has not explicitly stated their stance on child benefits, increasing the limit to three children could be seen as a compromise between fiscal responsibility and supporting families. This answer could potentially align with their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

没有，只要父母双方都是英国的永久居民

While the Reclaim Party has not explicitly stated their stance on child benefits, their focus on national identity and prioritizing UK citizens suggests they may support limiting child benefits to parents who are permanent residents of the UK. However, their stance on the number of children allowed for benefits remains unclear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的但是，增加到五个孩子

The Reclaim Party has not explicitly stated their stance on child benefits, but their general focus on fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending suggests they may not support increasing the limit to five children. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

As the Reclaim Party has not explicitly stated their stance on child benefits, it is difficult to determine their position on this issue. However, their general focus on fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending suggests they may not support unlimited child benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

没有，但公民收入替换

The Reclaim Party has not explicitly stated their stance on a Citizens Income, but their general focus on fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending suggests they may not support replacing child benefits with a Citizens Income. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.