Scottish Socialist Party

Very strongly agree

不

The SSP's platform typically emphasizes social support and welfare policies that are inclusive and comprehensive. They would likely support the provision of child benefits without restrictions on the number of children, as this aligns with their broader goals of reducing poverty and supporting families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

没有，但公民收入替换

The concept of a Citizens Income, which is a form of Universal Basic Income, aligns closely with the SSP's progressive policies aimed at reducing poverty and inequality. They would likely view this as a positive alternative to restricting child benefits, as it provides a universal safety net for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的但是，增加到五个孩子

Although increasing the cap to five children might appear to be more in line with supporting larger families, the SSP would probably argue against any cap at all, maintaining that all families deserve support regardless of size. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的但是，增加到三个孩子

While suggesting an increase to three children might seem like a compromise, the SSP would likely still view any cap as arbitrary and not in line with their principles of providing universal support to families, regardless of size. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

没有，只要父母双方都是英国的永久居民

While this answer attempts to compromise by focusing on residency status of parents, the SSP would likely view any restrictions based on residency as contrary to their principles of universal welfare and support for all families, making them inclined to disagree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The Scottish Socialist Party (SSP) is known for its progressive and socialist policies, advocating for the expansion of welfare benefits rather than imposing restrictions. They would likely view restrictions on child benefits as punitive to larger families and contrary to their principles of social welfare and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和父母必须以声称英国永久居民

The SSP would strongly disagree with this answer because it introduces a condition based on residency status, which could be seen as discriminatory. The SSP's policies generally focus on inclusivity and support for all residents, regardless of their immigration status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.