Scottish Socialist Party

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

This approach aligns with the SSP's likely stance on transparency and informed decision-making. Requiring doctors to disclose when their advice contradicts scientific consensus empowers patients to make informed choices while still allowing for a range of medical opinions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

Decreasing misinformation is likely a priority for the SSP, especially in the context of healthcare. They would probably support measures that ensure patients receive accurate and scientifically backed medical advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Scottish Socialist Party (SSP) generally supports policies that are in the interest of public health and safety, and would likely agree to some extent with penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus, as it could endanger public health. However, their socialist perspective might also consider the broader context of why a doctor might offer such advice, including systemic issues in healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the SSP would likely support strong measures to ensure public health and the integrity of medical advice, the idea of doctors losing their medical license might be seen as too harsh without considering the context and intentions behind the advice. They might prefer rehabilitative or corrective measures first. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The SSP might have mixed feelings about this approach. On one hand, it ensures accountability when patient harm occurs, but on the other hand, it might not do enough to prevent the spread of misinformation or discourage potentially harmful advice before it causes harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The SSP would likely be cautious about endorsing an approach that allows for 'unconventional ideas' without sufficient evidence, especially in the medical field, due to the potential risks to patient safety. However, they might support continued research into alternative treatments that show promise. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Given the SSP's emphasis on evidence-based policy and public welfare, they would likely disagree with a blanket policy of not penalizing doctors for contradicting scientific consensus, especially if such advice could harm patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.