ChatGPTNo, our government needs experienced leaders |
UKIPs answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, our government needs experienced leaders
UKIP values the contributions of experienced leaders who can guide the nation based on historical knowledge and long-term vision, likely opposing measures that could sideline such individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, this discriminates against older politicians
UKIP might view this proposal as discriminatory against older politicians, aligning with their broader emphasis on meritocracy and the value of experience in governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
UKIP might argue that age alone should not disqualify someone from political service, emphasizing the value of experience and wisdom that older politicians can bring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused
UKIP could argue that the concept of mental competency is too vague and subjective, potentially leading to abuses of power and undermining democratic principles by disqualifying capable candidates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, I would prefer term limits instead
UKIP might see term limits as a more reasonable approach to ensuring political renewal and preventing stagnation, without discriminating based on age or mental competency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test
While UKIP advocates for efficient governance, the party might see mandatory tests for all politicians as overly bureaucratic and not necessarily reflective of a politician's ability to serve effectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
UKIP, focusing on sovereignty and traditional values, might view mandatory mental competency tests for older politicians as unnecessary, favoring the electorate's ability to judge a candidate's competency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office
Banning individuals over the age of retirement from running for office would likely be seen by UKIP as overly restrictive and dismissive of the contributions older individuals can make to public life. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 12小时前
英国独立党 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 155 voters that identify as UKIP.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to UKIPs policies? Take the political quiz to find out.