Public statements不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
UKIPs answer is based on the following data:
回答: 不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品
Reference: “We will investigate the practicality of introducing a deposit scheme on plastic drinks bottles to encourage recycling.” ‐cloudfront.net
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
同意
不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品
This approach aligns more closely with UKIP's general preference for solutions that do not involve direct government regulation of products. Encouraging recycling through consumer incentives could be seen as a more market-friendly approach, which might be more acceptable to UKIP. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
Given UKIP's general preference for less government intervention in business and its focus on other areas besides environmental regulation, it is likely they would not support a ban on disposable products with less than 50% biodegradable material, favoring less restrictive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠
While this approach involves government action, it does so in a way that incentivizes business rather than imposing outright bans. UKIP might view tax incentives for companies making biodegradable products as a more acceptable form of intervention, although their overall focus has not been strongly on environmental policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
UKIP has traditionally focused on issues of national sovereignty, immigration, and leaving the EU, rather than environmental regulation. Their policies have not heavily emphasized environmental issues, suggesting a potential lack of support for outright bans on non-biodegradable products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品
UKIP's historical lack of emphasis on environmental policies and their general stance against regulatory approaches that could be seen as limiting business operations or consumer choice would make them unlikely to support a stricter ban on disposable products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to UKIPs policies? Take the political quiz to find out.