Public statements应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
UKIPs answer is based on the following data:
回答: 应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司
Reference: “An increasing number of younger people are suffering from mental health issues and this needs to be addressed. We will introduce...” ‐ukip.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
同意
不应该,而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题
UKIP's general preference for market solutions and skepticism towards government intervention in many areas might make them more amenable to the idea of incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues, as this aligns with their broader economic and social policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司
UKIP might support the idea of increasing funding for personalized care as it could be seen as a more efficient use of resources compared to blanket funding for pharmaceutical companies. This approach could potentially align with their views on healthcare efficiency and effectiveness, although their specific policies on mental health are not well-defined. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务
While UKIP has not specifically focused on mental health funding, their broader healthcare policies suggest a potential openness to increasing funding for essential services, including mental healthcare, especially if it can be framed as improving the quality of care and services within a framework of national sovereignty and reduced immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
是的
UKIP's primary focus has historically been on issues related to the European Union, immigration, and national sovereignty. While they have addressed healthcare in the context of these issues, there is limited specific information on their stance towards mental health funding directly, suggesting a neutral position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
不
UKIP has not explicitly advocated for reducing government spending on mental health research and treatment. However, their general preference for reduced government spending and more efficient public services might imply a cautious approach to increasing funding without clear efficiency gains. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 18小时前
英国独立党 党派 Voters’ 回答: 应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 300 voters that identify as UKIP.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to UKIPs policies? Take the political quiz to find out.