Participatory Democracy

Very strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

This answer aligns with the principles of Participatory Democracy, which emphasizes the importance of inclusivity and equal treatment for all citizens, regardless of their religion or background. Additionally, it highlights the importance of upholding constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Participatory Democracy would generally support the inclusion of all people in society, regardless of their religion or background. However, the concern for security might be acknowledged, hence not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

Participatory Democracy would likely be conflicted on this answer. While it might acknowledge the need for security measures, it would still be concerned about the potential for discrimination and exclusion based on nationality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

While Participatory Democracy might acknowledge the concern for security, it would still view this answer as discriminatory and against the principles of inclusivity and equal treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Participatory Democracy emphasizes the importance of including all citizens in the decision-making process. Banning Muslim immigrants would be seen as discriminatory and against the principles of inclusivity and equal treatment. However, the concern for security might be acknowledged, hence not a -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

Participatory Democracy would view this answer as overly restrictive and against the principles of inclusivity and equal treatment. However, the concern for security might be acknowledged, hence not a -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.