Animal Welfare Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Animal Welfare Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they generally support fairness and equality. Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet would help ensure a level playing field for all websites and promote competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Animal Welfare Party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support fairness and equality. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would help maintain a level playing field for all websites and promote competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Animal Welfare Party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support fairness and equality. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would be detrimental to consumers and smaller businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Animal Welfare Party might slightly disagree with this answer, as they generally support fairness and equality. While a pay-per-quality model might seem more fair, it could still lead to an unfair advantage for larger companies that can afford to pay more for better quality, potentially stifling competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The Animal Welfare Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support fairness and equality. Giving priority by type rather than source could still lead to an unfair advantage for certain websites and stifle competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The Animal Welfare Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support fairness and equality. While this approach might make the internet faster and more reliable for some users, it could also lead to an unfair advantage for larger companies and stifle competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Animal Welfare Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support fairness and equality. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to an unfair advantage for larger companies and stifle competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.