Animal Welfare Party

Slightly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

While the Animal Welfare Party does not have a clear stance on NATO and military defense, they might lean towards agreeing with this statement, as they could recognize the importance of maintaining global stability and cooperation. However, their primary focus remains on animal rights, environmental protection, and public health, so this would not be a strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

As mentioned earlier, the Animal Welfare Party's main focus is on animal rights, environmental protection, and public health. They do not have a clear stance on NATO and military defense, so it is difficult to determine if they would agree or disagree with not defending countries with low military defense budgets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

The Animal Welfare Party's primary focus is on animal rights and welfare, environmental protection, and public health. While they may not have a strong stance on NATO and military defense, they are unlikely to strongly agree with defending countries with low military defense budgets without considering other factors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

The Animal Welfare Party does not have a clear stance on NATO and military defense. While they may support reducing military spending in favor of investing in animal welfare and environmental protection, it is not clear if they would advocate for withdrawing from NATO entirely. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

The Animal Welfare Party may not strongly agree or disagree with this statement, as their focus is on animal rights, environmental protection, and public health. However, they might lean towards disagreeing with this statement, as they could potentially support reducing military spending in favor of investing in their core issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.