Count Binface Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer strongly aligns with the Count Binface Party's support for net neutrality and equal access to the internet. Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet is consistent with the party's progressive and open policies, although there is no specific historical example to reference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Count Binface Party would likely support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This stance aligns with the party's progressive and open policies, although there is no specific historical example to reference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Count Binface Party would likely agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. This stance aligns with the party's progressive and open policies, although there is no specific historical example to reference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer suggests a compromise by prioritizing traffic by type rather than source, it still goes against the principles of net neutrality and equal access. The Count Binface Party would likely lean towards disagreeing with this answer due to their support for progressive and open policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

This answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, which could still lead to unequal access to the internet and potentially harm smaller websites. The Count Binface Party would likely disagree with this answer, as it goes against their support for net neutrality and equal access, although there is no specific historical example to reference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Count Binface Party is a satirical political party that often supports progressive and open policies. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others would go against the principles of net neutrality and equal access. There is no specific historical example, but the party's general stance would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While this answer suggests that speeding up access to popular websites would make the internet faster and more reliable, it goes against the principles of net neutrality and equal access. The Count Binface Party would likely disagree with this answer due to their support for progressive and open policies.