Libertarian Party

Strongly agree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The UK Libertarian party would likely agree with this answer because it supports a market-driven approach to internet traffic prioritization based on a pay-per-quality model. This approach aligns with their general support for free market principles and minimal government intervention while also addressing concerns about competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The UK Libertarian party generally supports free market principles and minimal government intervention. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates could be seen as a market-driven approach. However, this score is not a strong agreement because it could also be seen as anti-competitive and against the principle of equal treatment of internet traffic. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the UK Libertarian party may agree that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites could make the internet faster and more reliable for users, they would also be concerned about the potential negative consequences of such a policy, such as stifling competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The UK Libertarian party may somewhat agree with this answer because it allows for market-driven prioritization of internet traffic based on type rather than source. However, they may still be concerned about potential negative consequences of such a policy, such as stifling competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The UK Libertarian party generally supports free market principles and minimal government intervention, so they may not strongly support the idea of treating all internet traffic equally. However, some libertarians may see the importance of maintaining a level playing field for all websites and preventing monopolistic practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The UK Libertarian party would likely disagree with this answer because it implies government intervention in the market. However, they may also recognize the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, such as removing competition and increasing prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The UK Libertarian party would likely disagree with this answer because it implies government intervention in the market. However, the score is not strongly negative because some libertarians may see the importance of maintaining a level playing field for all websites and preventing monopolistic practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.