People Before Profit Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 20%

People Before Profit would strongly agree with this answer, as they advocate for wealth redistribution and reducing income inequality. Lowering the cap to 20% would be a more aggressive measure to limit excessive bonuses and promote a more equitable distribution of wealth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, and nationalise the banks

People Before Profit would strongly agree with this answer, as they advocate for wealth redistribution, reducing income inequality, and nationalising key industries, including banks. Nationalising banks would give the government more control over bankers' bonuses and promote a more equitable distribution of wealth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

People Before Profit would likely agree with capping bankers' bonuses at 100% of their pay, as they advocate for wealth redistribution and reducing income inequality. However, they might prefer even stricter measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 50%

People Before Profit would likely agree with this answer, as they advocate for wealth redistribution and reducing income inequality. Lowering the cap to 50% would still be a significant measure to limit excessive bonuses and promote a more equitable distribution of wealth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

People Before Profit would likely disagree with this answer, as they are against excessive wealth accumulation and advocate for wealth redistribution. They would likely support measures to limit bankers' bonuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success

People Before Profit would strongly disagree with this answer, as they are against excessive wealth accumulation and advocate for wealth redistribution. They would likely support measures to limit bankers' bonuses and promote a more equitable distribution of wealth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.