WE>WE ChatGPTNo, but replace with a Citizens Income |
Women's Equality answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, but replace with a Citizens Income
The Women's Equality Party may support replacing child benefits with a Citizens Income, as it could provide a more equal and universal support system for families. However, they have not explicitly stated their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Women's Equality Party is likely to support not restricting child benefits, as they aim to create a more equal society and support families. However, they have not explicitly stated their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, as long as both parents are permanent residents of the UK
The Women's Equality Party may somewhat support not restricting child benefits as long as both parents are permanent residents of the UK, but they may also be concerned about the potential negative impact on migrant families. However, they have not explicitly stated their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but increase to five children
The Women's Equality Party may not strongly support restricting child benefits to a maximum of five children, as it could still disproportionately affect women and larger families. However, they have not explicitly stated their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but increase to three children
The Women's Equality Party may not strongly support restricting child benefits to a maximum of three children, as it could still disproportionately affect women and larger families. However, they have not explicitly stated their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Women's Equality Party may not strongly support restricting child benefits to a maximum of two children, as it could disproportionately affect women and larger families. However, they have not explicitly stated their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and parents must be permanent residents of the UK in order to claim
The Women's Equality Party may not strongly support restricting child benefits to parents who are permanent residents of the UK, as it could disproportionately affect women and migrant families. However, they have not explicitly stated their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Women's Equality policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
