63%
Yes
37%
No
63%
Yes
15%
No
22%
No, vocational or skill based qualifications should also be available

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “GCSE Exams” has changed over time for 967k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “GCSE Exams” has changed over time for 967k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @8FC6866answered…4yrs4Y

No GCSE exams are not a good source of measuring education and qualifications.

 @9LWF7V4answered…4 days4D

No, it should be based on whether students sit exams well or not, skill based examinations not necessarily written exams and pressure should be alleviated from students to refuse stress etc

 @9LQDDX5from Maine answered…1wk1W

No, and GCSE qualifications should be replaced with more advanced and rigorous syllabi that do no lead up to national exams to free up teaching time.

 @9LC6KX5answered…4wks4W

No. This is very vague and does not account for students who have different learning needs, neurodivergence, and disability.

 @9L7TXG8answered…1mo1MO

Yes because this promotes hard work, but there should be slightly less pressure put on them, and more post-GCSE options promoted for those who do not do as well