Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

495 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

Yes

 @9N8FMLMdisagreed…2yrs2Y

Renting can create a market where landlords are providing good quality housing where if maintained well can be very beneficial for both parties. The control should be placed on the quality of properties given out not necessarily on the money flowing through the process as it benefits housing markets and can help people when waiting for a deposit (if they do desire)

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

No

 @B85MJ3DLibertarianagreed…6mos6MO

Empirical evidence strongly supports my critique of rent control:

Stanford (2019) found that San Francisco’s 1994 rent control expansion led to a 15% reduction in rental supply, as landlords converted units to condos or withdrew them from the market.

Cambridge, MA saw rents rise by 45–50% and property values increase by 18% citywide after rent control was repealed in 1994—indicating prior suppression of supply and investment.

European Central Bank (2020) analysis showed rent control correlates with lower housing construction rates and poorer maintenance quality across OECD coun…  Read more

 @BBGG5ZWagreed…2mos2MO

Private landlord is a housing supplier in a commercial market. They need to make a reasonable profit to keep their business viable, just the same with other business.

 @B8TTFZLagreed…5mos5MO

Cambridge, MA saw rents rise by 45–50% and property values increase by 18% citywide after rent control was repealed in 1994—indicating prior suppression of supply and investment.

 @B7NXBMTagreed…7mos7MO

If someone privately owns an apartment that they want to rent out, they should be able to choose how much they charge depending on location, size and quality of the building.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...1yr1Y

Yes, housing is a basic right that should be affordable to anyone

 @BCZL6QS disagreed…2wks2W

The problem with the supply of housing is caused by restrictions on house building and government money printing, which causes people to treat houses as investments rather than consumer goods. Rent control doesn't fix those problems and price controls always cause shortages.

 @BD2C2HVdisagreed…2wks2W

The housing crisis is due to mass immigration. There are other factors too but that’s the biggest one. It’s damaged supply. Demand has risen. Price increased

 @BCZRHQ6disagreed…2wks2W

Rent control is needed to give everyone affordable homes, it’s also needed for students who live in their uni city and will be paid back in due time when they start working and giving back to the economy

 @BBDQ4G7 disagreed…2mos2MO

I would agree with that argument that housing is a basic right that should be affordable for everyone, but just saying something is a right doesn't magically make it abundant. We need to support the right policies to make it abundant. If we both care about affordable housing for everyone, we should support policies that have been proven to work and not policies that sound good on the surface but actually make the problem worse. The best way to make housing affordable is massively expanding development of new housing which will increase supply and therefore reduce prices, not rent control…  Read more

 @B9HS3R3 disagreed…4mos4MO

Housing should be considered basic right however it is not feasible to have privately owned rental properties be capped at rates in which they are affordable to everyone. Affordable housing should be government subsidised as it is not the responsibility of the landlord to reduce their personal income to accommodate those who are less fortunate. Rather this responsibility lies on the government, and it is unfair to shift this responsibility onto market participants who stimulate the economy through their activity.

 @BCYTDCSdisagreed…2wks2W

Rent control is agreed by most experts to harm housing affordability, supply, and quality in the long-run, and thus reduce people's access to housing

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...1yr1Y

No, ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate instead

 @BB3ZV3Yagreed…3mos3MO

Foreign investors and corporations own housing purely for profit. That means they make vast sums of money on an incredibly limited resource, that people NEED to survive and live happily. It is simply wrong.

 @B7R9L9VLiberal Democrat agreed…7mos7MO

Corporate and Foreign investors buying up property in the UK causes an increase in houses prices disproportionately to the increase in income, this means that people cant afford housing anymore especially younger generations and this could lead to a a lack of a home owning middle class

 @B6HHDYVagreed…9mos9MO

Housing has been used by Russian Oligarchs to invest their assets in, to decrease the liklihood of frozen assets. This problem has remained unsolved and grown.

 @B57WBLQ agreed…1yr1Y

We need to maintain the UK our investors in this country should be invested in this country. We don’t need foreigners investing in our country keeping money in the country UK investment for UK people. That’s how it should be.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...1yr1Y

No, incentivize the development of new housing instead

 @B9PCFCVagreed…3mos3MO

New investments into housing will help remove brownfield disused sites and generate a positive socioeconomic and environmental effect on the population.

 @B63STWT agreed…10mos10MO

We have not built enough homes since the sixties. In order to rectify this, we need a massive house building effort to satisfy demand. This can only be achieved through the private sector, the state cannot build fast enough or cost efficient enough without majorly increasing taxation.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...1yr1Y

Yes, but only in areas with housing shortages

 @B9HS3R3 disagreed…4mos4MO

Rent control will reduce the number of landlords willing to let out properties as it becomes less sustainable/profitable, reducing housing options for not only those who experience housing shortages but those who are currently renting. Without a large portion of landlords participating in market activity rental prices will be driven upwards in areas not under rent control.

 @BBLKY97 disagreed…2mos2MO

Rent control creates issues regarding housing supply, due to removing two incentives by landlords. The first is new development, as a rent control like any price control is set below the market price lowering the return for the landlord and reducing his incentive. The second is that landlords with existing housing stock leave the market due to the reduced incentive allowing housing stock to decay and become dilapidated reducing current supply. This is observed across the globe with rent controls in the USA and most recently Argentina having negative affects which went away upon the removal of such controls.

 @BCZL6QS disagreed…2wks2W

Rent controls are price controls and price controls make shortages worse not better because high prices deter marginal buyers and incentivise more provision if builders are free to build, which they aren't in this country. The shortages are a result of restrictions on house building and government money printing, which makes people treat houses as investments rather than consumer goods.

 @BBB8NQ7disagreed…2mos2MO

History shows that markets control themselves. This policy sounds nice but it failed in Scotland. Landlords can only charge what the market dictates that they can.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...1yr1Y

No, rent controls have been shown to limit the supply of housing

 @BCZL6QS agreed…2wks2W

https://iea.org.uk/publications/home-win-what-if-britain-solved-its-housing-crisis/
https://www.drjefferydegner.com/inflation-the-family
https://mises.org/library/book/forty-centuries-wage-and-price-controls-how-not-fight-inflation

 @9P58SF3answered…2yrs2Y

No, but housing associations and landlords should be held more to account for the standard of their properties.

 @9NJN2GXLabouranswered…2yrs2Y

No - historically this has never worked and always causes the number of available properties to shrink

 @9N2HY2Tanswered…2yrs2Y

No one should own more than 1 home therefore landlord should not exist except for social housing

 @9P7KNKVanswered…2yrs2Y

I don't think an amount per se but the rate of increase should be regulated and home that don't meet the living standards such as energy efficiency, mould-proof shouldn't get any increases until they've been fixed by the landlords.

 @9P7BYMLConservativeanswered…2yrs2Y

We pay ridiculous rents for years demonstrating ability to pay and yet we are refused mortgages that would cost us a portion of our rent this is unacceptable and should be reviewed if a person has a history of good timely rent payments that should be proof of ability to maintain mortgage payments that are dramatically lower

 @9P6YBYJanswered…2yrs2Y

No, because that causes distortion to the market. But the government should make housing more affordable by relaxing planning restrictions and building social housing

 @9P4S5J7answered…2yrs2Y

No as they may raise interest rates and taxes so would reduce the amount of landlords and in turn reduce rentable properties

 @9P2Z4HWanswered…2yrs2Y

With mortgages going up the landlords need to cover their costs as long as they’re not taking advantage

 @9Q4XGZ6answered…2yrs2Y

No, but there should be more regulations on living conditions & more protection for landlords in the event of a squatters

 @9PBFMX8answered…2yrs2Y

Bring back rent officers to inspect rental property and check the level of rent being charged is fair

 @BD6GPJCanswered…4 days4D

 @BD5XWWVfrom Ohio  answered…5 days5D

 @BD5DZ4WLiberal Democrat answered…6 days6D

No, firstly many landlords that rent will have a mortgage and if their mortgage goes up so must rent. Plus rent controls have been shown to limit the supply of housing.

 @BCYR22Kanswered…2wks2W

 @BCWVB59from Rhode Island  answered…2wks2W

No, repeal all non-safety based regulations to make building new housing more affordable.

 @BCW4RSRanswered…2wks2W

 @BCW2K5Ganswered…2wks2W

Rent should be based on the size and features of a property. And also, corporate and foreign investors should be unable to purchase residential real estate.

 @BCTFCNPanswered…3wks3W

Yes, but only to make sure landlords are not overcharging those who are in need to immediate shelter

 @BCSRDFGanswered…3wks3W

Housing should be affordable for everyone but also shouldn't mean standards slip if the rent is lower. New housing being built is also important. No one should be left on the street or feel they can't move out of the family home because they can't afford to

 @BCR3TWGanswered…3wks3W

 @BCQLGJMIndependentanswered…3wks3W

Yes, but they should expand social housing and other affordable rent structures in order to avoid people being priced out.

 @BCPTMCXanswered…4wks4W

Yes but also make mortgage lenders take into account rent that has been paid is affordable therefore mortgage payments of equal to or less are affordable

 @BCP9WRManswered…4wks4W

I believe there should be a limit to stop landlords from being greedy but it should be circumstantial based on location etc and how many properties a landlord has to stop landlords being greedy. It should be fair for both parties

 @BC778TCanswered…1mo1MO

no, govt funding should be provided for thse who can least afford it, but no rent controls. should be economic freedom

 @BB94RXFanswered…2mos2MO

"Government interference in rent prices is a failed policy that creates more problems than it solves. What we need is to clear the path for developers by cutting the 'stupid' and irrational red tape that halts construction. Environmental protection must be based on science, not mindless bureaucracy. Once the supply is unlocked, we should hammer speculators and middlemen with heavy taxes. Real estate flipping adds zero value to the economy and should be made cost-prohibitive. We must also curb foreign influence in our domestic housing market."

 @B9Z68PPLiberal Democratanswered…3mos3MO

The government should sort out council managed properties and housing associations before going after private landlords, however, there should be tighter laws in place on both sides of the tenancy to provide and maintain a standard of care and for the tenant to be held to their agreements too.

 @B9X5LS8answered…3mos3MO

yes as long as it works on increase amount and ban coperate and forreighn investors from buying residential real estate

 @B9VXMH6answered…3mos3MO

It should be monitored and any clear overcharge should be investigated and altered if deemed incorrect by a competent and elected independent housing authority.

 @B9NDY8RGreenanswered…3mos3MO

yes but only based on the price of the house if it were to be sold and ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing real estate

 @B9LMJJ8answered…4mos4MO

They should be able to apply a big rent for luxury accommodation but for normal living it should be affordable

 @B9FT8SBanswered…4mos4MO

It is unfair for people such as landlords to randomly raise your rent for no reason, people who do that should be fined at least £1000

 @B9DKQ95answered…4mos4MO

Yes; but seek to curb private landlordism through tax and regulation, end right-to-buy, give local government powers to buy back housing stock from private sector and build more social housing.

 @B9C5ZHQanswered…4mos4MO

In theory yes, notwithstanding studies in rent control. Housing is a right.. HOwever, most councils use schemes like licensing as a cash grab under the guise of ensuring better landlords (and do not appear to take action against bad 'uns, if they even register). Without getting their own houses in order it is meaningless.

 @B996TB6answered…4mos4MO

I think there should be rent control but I also think you should ban people buying houses if they are not even living there since they don’t need it.

 @B929HYTGreenanswered…5mos5MO

Yes, limit all rent to 30% of a monthly income on full-time national minimum wage. Fine and expropriate properties from landlords that fail to implement this cap

 @B8ZJ6FQanswered…5mos5MO

For poor people there should be a lower house price available but for middle class and above can get charged what they want

 @B8YNNFZanswered…5mos5MO

No, make it significantly more difficult for foreigners to access housing instead so citizens have less competition

 @B8BMBWBanswered…6mos6MO

Rent on houses that have a mortgage (eg. BTL) should be capped at cost+10% - this will sort the rental market out across the country.

 @B89JKHJGreenanswered…6mos6MO

Rent controls should be implemented but alongside other policies that ensure new housing projects are built alongside so that non-controlled units do not have their prices increase as a result.

 @B7X39H4from Famagusta  answered…6mos6MO

it depends on the area and estate l. i think the government should divide them into sections where certain areas or estates can charge more than others. this is because of the luxury factor included in some estates.

 @B7VQK2Yanswered…7mos7MO

As a band-aid (short-term) solution yes, but the commodification of housing and broader crisis in housing needs to be addressed properly in a way which can secure long term differences for renters and home owners

 @B7R47ZRGreenanswered…7mos7MO

I believe that everyone should be able to afford housing, therefore dependant on the area and the actual home, the rent must be capped at a certain amount. Those in richer areas, with larger homes can cost more however they cannot exceed a certain amount on average homes.

 @B7DD3JNanswered…7mos7MO

Housing should be affordable and not need to be rented, housing should be a civil right, but obviously to maintain stability we still need an economy so lower the costs to fit the people who need it instead of raising the costs to make the rich richer

 @B7DCP6Qanswered…7mos7MO

Housing should be a civil right, abolish landlords and make housing affordable for the lower classes

 @B75VWLZanswered…8mos8MO

No, but end right-to-buy, give powers to councils to buy housing stock out of the private market and build more council housing to reduce reliance on private rental sector

 @B75F8NSanswered…8mos8MO

Yes but only in areas with housing shortages and ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate as well.

 @B6QQGQSanswered…8mos8MO

No, rent controls is bad, it limits supply of housing (given that UK has a housing shortage), so causing more homeless people, instead the government should focus on increasing supply of housing, by innovating in cutting-edge construction technology

(e.g 3D printing house, modular construction etc)

 @B6NP32FReform UKanswered…8mos8MO

Rent controls seems good at the start; however it creates excess demand causing reduced supply, causing more number of homeless people.

 @B6M4SFRanswered…9mos9MO

Yes, prioritize corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate and back up with some rent controls and freezes but not to the point where supply should be negatively affected

 @B6J4VNSanswered…9mos9MO

If rent control policies are implemented it is likely that landlords will simply remove their properties of the market, reducing housing. This is counter intuitive. Instead we should develop cheaper property.

 @B6FM2KLLiberal Democratanswered…9mos9MO

yes depending on area and salary and if the landlord or tenant wants to change the price of the rent it should go through a court system.

 @B5ZXVSHanswered…10mos10MO

No, incentivise the development of new housing instead and restrict and limit corporate and foreign investors including private equity firms from purchasing residential real estate.

 @B5Y9XCLLabouranswered…10mos10MO

Yes but only to corporate and foreign investors to disincentivise them to allow housing stock to be bought by local individuals

 @B5W6BDDanswered…11mos11MO

yes i think the max a small house should go for is 1.7k for a medium house 3k big houses 4-5k max and mansions 40k max

 @B5RR647answered…11mos11MO

Yes but ONLY in accorande to value of the property this includes the aesthetics ie. More run down , bad walls ext = lower rate

 @B5PCLC8answered…11mos11MO

Housing should be done with the help of real estate SMEs, local cooperatives and local councils, huge asset management companies like BlackRock should be forced out of this deal

 @B5988HJanswered…12mos12MO

Yes, but as a carefully targeted and temporary measure in areas with severe housing shortages, implemented alongside significant investment in increasing the supply of affordable housing and providing direct housing assistance to low-income individuals.

 @B57RCDCanswered…1yr1Y

I am a georgist, I believe that the central source of revenue for the government should be a land value tax (which should include taxes on the depletion of or occupation of natural resources)

 @B4YKR29answered…1yr1Y

There's a lot of nuance to the discussion and I agree with 2 of the selections along with not knowing enough about a third to have an accurate opinion.

 @B4LSGRKanswered…1yr1Y

Invest in housing available for all citizens so all citizens can privately own their own home instead of landlords

 @B4GGX67answered…1yr1Y

1. Rent Control with Flexibility:
Rent control policies should allow for gradual rent increases tied to inflation or market conditions, ensuring that rent prices remain affordable while allowing landlords to cover rising costs and make necessary property improvements.
2. Incentives for Landlord Investment:
To avoid disincentivizing maintenance and property development, governments could offer tax incentives or subsidies to landlords who invest in maintaining or improving their rental properties. This would help balance affordability with property quality.
3. Increased Housing Supply:
In…  Read more

 @B48W72Fanswered…1yr1Y

No, as landlords are only increasing rent prices due to rising costs of interest repayments, gas and electric etc. instead more measures should be taken to control the diabolical increase of living costs.

 @B3H865QReform UKanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, housing is a basic right that should be affordable to everyone, but the rent control policies should consider the location, house, and income of landlord and tenant. We should also ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate as well.

 @B33PVF9answered…1yr1Y

Incentivise the development of new housing and van corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate as well.

 @B2WS4VNWomen's Equality answered…1yr1Y

Yes

Yes. Housing associations etc should have the rent charges controlled. Especially when the properties they rent are below standard.

 @B2JQW8Hanswered…1yr1Y

Rental prices based on economic state for raising costs of running the property and based on specific demand. Rental charges within reason and there is a threshold.

 @B2BPRTZanswered…1yr1Y

Landlords and rents/rent control should not exist, housing should be a human right and should be controlled by the people.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...