Diesel emissions standards regulate the amount of pollutants that diesel engines can emit to reduce air pollution. Proponents argue that stricter standards improve air quality and public health by reducing harmful emissions. Opponents argue that it increases costs for manufacturers and consumers and could reduce the availability of diesel vehicles.
@9P63ZVGConservative2 days2D
No, wait until clean technology is readily available and affordable before reducing the use of combustion.
@9P9GHF841mins41m
Depends on evidence, as keep hearing that more charges are coming in based on evidence which is not always correct.
@9P9DGCJ2hrs2H
My opinion is companies like the Volkswagen group should be in a higher tax bracket, all cars should be petrol or electric or hybrid etc diesel in cars should go and only agricultural and large transportation should be diesel
@9P8TYPPIndependent13hrs13H
Diesel is actually more economical and more environmentally friendly than petrol for long distance driving. So it's a grey area
@9P87ZR621hrs21H
No because I was encouraged to buy diesel by the current government. They should also remove tax on electric vehicle charging.
I would say yes make road tax more for diesel and petrol cars less. I don't understand why my focus petrol car is £260 per year to tax and is LEZ compliant but my friends car is a diesel £30 per year road tax and ISN'T LEZ compliant!?
@9P7VQ8K1 day1D
The government should be implementing regulations on all vehicles releasing emissions, but must provide equivalent alternatives that won’t burden the public financially.
@9P6XYZ4Conservative2 days2D
No, but encourage the switchover to PHEV and EV with grants and abolish the luxury tax surcharge on EV/PHEV
@9P6QG3C2 days2D
No because they advocated changing to diesel a few years ago. Now users are being penalised for a government incentive.
@9P6LYBDConservative2 days2D
Yes, diesel vehicles that don't meet the Euro6 compliance should be phased out of use over a period of time with financial help from the government
@9P6GS8K2 days2D
My diesel vehicle is more economical than my petrol vehicle so there needs to be better standards across all vehicle types, not just diesel.
@9P5ZDHP2 days2D
Let car companies lead the advances, most people would choose a more economical car if they could afford one
@9P5Q8SF2 days2D
No penalties for diesel vehicles as usually only poor people have diesel cars. Make more public transport
@9P5DQ8PLiberal Democrat3 days3D
Only in areas where the air quality demands it. A total ban would adversely impact industry and agriculture
i think it is a difficult question to answer as it could lead to the loss of jobs and business crisis however it limits the amount of carbon into the world
@9P4TXFL3 days3D
Yes, but they should offer money to those who can’t afford to switch to environmentally friendly vehicles.
@9P494MT3 days3D
Further investigation should be undertaken to identify cleaner and safer technologies without penalising motorists
Yes, but only with greater investment into hybrid/electric vehicles and infrastructure to support them.
@9P3YDBBConservative3 days3D
No, Wait until cleaner technologies become more accessible and less expensive. The carbon emission reduction is being rushed.
@9P3SNNQ3 days3D
If your going to help with that average working man/woman and help them to convert from diesel to a more greener way of commenting etc then yes
@9P2TDNG4 days4D
depends because some people cannot afford other vehicles but also stricter emissions standards would improve the environment
Yes they should, but the restrictions/taxes (no doubt) need to focus on large corporations - tackling and restricting their emissions, than John Smith down the road whose emission are a drop in the ocean. Tax and restrict the corporations. regulate the market
@9NZS9484 days4D
Yes, but this should be supported by additional funding to support the change to less polluting vehicles.
@9NYN2B95 days5D
I feel restrictions are given with good intent but the good idea has been lost in the 'money' it's actually more costly to build an electric car than to run a petrol or diesel vehicle. Also the production of electric vehicles emits more toxic gasses into the environment than production of vehicles that are petrol or diesel.
@9NY68ZY5 days5D
remove them completely... especially for commuters and standard drivers, the rules should apply to businesses not meeting regulations as they have the most driving and damage caused while a person passing through gets punished for it
@9NXJG4M5 days5D
Diesel isn’t evil given that previous governments have directed people to have diesels. Incentives for water fueled cars
@9NXDVX36 days6D
The government encouraged buying of diesels. Just don't produce any more. They thus deminish over time.
@9NWJFW96 days6D
Absolutely not!!! How about looking at the bigger problem of electric vehicles that actually throw more waste into the environment constructing them!
@9NWH6KT6 days6D
The government needs to do more to incentivise sustainable practices than simple penalising individuals who can't afford the newest car.
@9NTXQLD7 days7D
No, they should redirect stricter emissions standards toward plastic factories and others of the sort.
I believe electric cars are just as bad to the environment as they use colbalt and slavery in the DRC, so all cars should have stricter environmental regulations.
@9NT3C771wk1W
Diesel emissions are now very low. Harmful pollution from tyres and brakes are more of an issue. CO2 emissions from petrol and diesel remains the biggest issue.
@9NS69QG1wk1W
Yes, build more infrastructure for electric vehicles and offer incentives to those with diesel cars to switch.
@9NRH9321wk1W
By taking back control of rail ways and public transport, and investing back into better cheaper public transport. They can then start to remove diesel vehicles
@9NQ5WJ21wk1W
Yes. Only if they provide subsidies for anybody who owns a vehicle that does not meet the new standards.
@9NKCSF9Count Binface2wks2W
Yes, but with means tested subsidies to allow those on lower incomes to upgrade to compliant vehicles
@9NBFYR92wks2W
Yes, although not for machinary needed for agricultural purposes, such as tractors and combine harvesters, etc. Same for fishing boats.
@9N83CTC2wks2W
The infrastructure is not there yet to use non diesel vehicles. Once electric/hydrogen powered vehicle's are available (not just cars) then start to implement stricter standards
@9N7WLMB2wks2W
Emissions standards need to be the same for petrol, diesel, alternatives
@9N7RH972wks2W
No they should not It’s a power trip from the government to get our money and take away our freedom away
@9N5GSG63wks3W
Diesel power is vital for HGV's and buses hauliers are already struggling enough as it is
@9N5BLYR3wks3W
This should be introduced but unlike some recent policies in time rather than rushed.
@9N56GTMConservative3wks3W
This is a non-question. Diesels are cleaner than all other cars now, from ‘cradle to grave’.
@9N2ZDXB3wks3W
Yes, if more than one car is owned by the household
@9MZNVY53wks3W
Blame lies on the company producing the cars that require diesel.
@9MXX66J3wks3W
All vehicles including the true cost to the environment of manufacturing cars.
@9MWRZ37Liberal Democrat3wks3W
this should be set against the manufacturer not the consumer
@9MV38MK3wks3W
ULEZ is already crippling key worker with low incomes in built up areas - leave this well alone so key workers can help the country to run
@9MTTS8V3wks3W
Only if electric vehicle incentives and more charging points are built.
@9MTLJNC3wks3W
Yes but not at the expense of the individual, encourage use of more environmental friendly alternatives.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...