Kokeile poliittinen tietokilpailu

0 Vastaa

 @T9Z296VihreäReading _ vastattu…4v4Y

There are several issues that have been rolled up in this issue. Firstly it is not about how much is spent on welfare benefits it is about what those on welfare need to survive. Poor housing leads to poor health physical and mental - However the cost of housing bears no relationship to its quality. We need to build council houses in expensive areas with rents affordable to people of limited means; Given we may never be able to build enough such house the actual rent charged should be means dependent.
The government should not be subsidizing private Industry but insisting that pay their staff a living wage. This would reduce the benefits bill. However all children, no matter the size of their family should get support from the state to ensure that they are not impoverished

 @T6F7S8UKIPReading _ vastattu…4v4Y

Replace working income for those with genuine health issues which mean they cannot work (with signed doctor approval), otherwise more reform so it supplements a working income.

 @T6F3Q2LiberaalidemokraattienLiverpool _ vastattu…4v4Y

Loopholes should be closed but for those legitimately claiming it doesn't provide enough support, but should never replace a working income.

 @Q575QVLondon, City of _ vastattu…4v4Y

Government should be doing more to relocate people with a desire to work and therefore reduce the overall burden of welfare on the rest of society.

 @Q55X8JGlasgow City _ vastattu…4v4Y

Benefits should be no more than the minimum wage of a full time worker, and only in place for those who truly need it

 @Q559PCEdinburgh, City of _ vastattu…4v4Y

Not all benefits should be targeted as they are being. Disability benefits in particular are being targeted too harshly.

 @Q54W88Kent _ vastattu…4v4Y

minimum wage should be significantly increased (perhaps varying by job type) in return no benefits paid to workers but instead money paid to businesses as a per employee-on-mimimum-wage incentive. The incentives to a businesses would reduce as the businesses became more profitable.

 @Q54D5WLancashire _ vastattu…4v4Y

 @Q4NHNDLondon, City of _ vastattu…4v4Y

Criteria for claiming should be reviewed and we have to create more jobs and jobs with a living wage

 @Q4B8NJNorth Lanarkshire _ vastattu…4v4Y

 @Q3WYQGLondon, City of _ vastattu…4v4Y

There's no easy answer to benefits. SOme people in dire need slip through the cracks, other learn to play the system. And sudden cut-off caps and limits discourage people from moving into the jobs market because a little improvement in wages leads to a huge cut in benefits

 @PXFL6RWokingham _ vastattu…4v4Y

Looking for fraud in the benefit system should be confined to just that, not penalising everyone.

 @PVZHQ5Hampshire _ vastattu…4v4Y

The punitive restrictions should be less harsh, and used only when all other potential situations have been fully explored and reasonably implemented.
The financial assistance offered should be raised to a sensible level (one where people aren't left in needless poverty), and there should be more practical support than just financial aid offered to those that need it.